J Korean Matern Child Health .  2024 Apr;28(2):65-74. 10.21896/jkmch.2024.28.2.65.

Exploring Infertility Treatment Among Economically Active Married Women

• KMID: 2555191
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.21896/jkmch.2024.28.2.65

Abstract

Purpose
This study aimed to assess the current landscape of infertility treatment among married women engaged in economic activities and analyze the associated factors.
Methods
Using data from the 2021 National Family and Fertility Survey in Korea, this study included 1,772 married women aged 20–44 who participated in economic activities. General characteristics were compared based on participants’ experiences with infertility and the use of infertility treatments (assisted reproductive technology). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with infertility and infertility treatment.
Results
Among the study participants, 325 had experienced infertility and 122 had undergone infertility treatment. The likelihood of infertility was higher in women aged ≥35 years and those with gynecological problems. Infertility treatment was more probable among infertile women over 40 years of age, with higher levels of education and household income, cohabiting with their spouse for 4–9 years, working less than 40 hours per week, and holding office jobs as opposed to service or sales workers. Respondents who underwent infertility treatment highlighted the following challenges: mental and social prejudice, physical discomfort, pain, financial burden, workplace factors, and time constraints.
Conclusion
This study shows that biological factors are important in infertility and underscores the significance of workplace factors and socioeconomic characteristics in the decision to treat infertility. This emphasizes the need for research that supports women pursuing a career or education who encounter the challenges of infertility.

Reference

Cho SH., Lee JN., Kim KT. Factors and policy challenges for married couple's childless choice. Sejong (Korea): Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2021. https://doi.org/10.23060/kihasa.a.2021.33.

Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Analysis of infertility and subfertility treatment status [Internet]. Wonju (Korea): Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service;2023. [cited 2023 May 25]. Available from: http://www.bosa.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=2198030.

Hwang NM., Kim DJ., Choi SK., Lee SH., Ko HS., Jang IS, et al. Current status and system improvement plan for infertility support, including expansion of infertility treatment. Sejong (Korea): Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2019. https://www.prism.go.kr/homepage/entire/researchDetail.do?researchId=1351000-20 2000211.

Imai Y., Endo M., Kuroda K., Tomooka K., Ikemoto Y., Sato S, et al. Risk factors for resignation from work after starting infertility treatment among Japanese women: Japan-Female Employment and Mental health in Assisted reproductive technology (J-FEMA) study. Occup Environ Med. 2021. 78:426–32.

Jeon HS., Kim DS. The experience of infertility treatment among women in relation to medical environment. Asian J Women Stud. 2022. 61:211–46.

Kim DS. Awareness and use of the infertility treatment leave system by infertile female workers and policy tasks. Seoul (Korea): Korean Women's Development Institute;2022b. https://scholar.kyobobook.co.kr/article/detail/4010029770040.

Kim DS., Hwang J., Tong C., Jeon H., Bu S. Gender cognitive analysis and improvement tasks for infertile couple support policy on South Korea. Seoul (Korea): Korean Women's Development Institute;2021. Available from: https://www.kwdi.re.kr/publications/reportView.do?idx=129332.

Kim JS., Park E. The journey of suffering: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the experience of failure of assisted reproductive technique in infertile couples. J Mar Sci. 2022. 34:814–29. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2022.10.34.5.814.

Kim M., Nam H., Youn M. Infertility stress, depression, and resilience in women with infertility treatments. J Korean Public Health Nurs. 2016. 30:93–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.5932/JKPHN.2016.30.1.93.

Kim TH. A study on support systems for overcoming infertility in Korea. Stud Soc Secur Law. 2022a. 47:531–65. https://kiss.kstudy.com/DetailOa/Ar?key=53216984.

Korean Law Information Center. Maternal and Child Health Act [enforced into force on June 22, 2022] [Law No. 18612, December 21, 2021, partially revised]. Sejong (Korea): Korean Law Information Center;2022. [cited 2024 Feb 27]. Available from: https://law.go.kr/%eb%b2%95%eb%a0%b9/%eb%aa%a8%ec%9e%90%eb%b3%b4%ea%b1%b4%eb%b2%95.

Lee SH., Choi SY., Park SM., Lim MK., Park JY., Choi SK, et al. Measures to improve the health information provision system centered on infertility treatment consumers. Sejong (Korea): Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2021. https://www.hira.or.kr/rc/icenter/study/getReportList.do?pgmid=HIRAA030095000000.

Lee SJ., Moon SH. The analysis of factors that influence the first childbirth intentions among married working women in South Korea. Korean J Fam Med. 2017. 55:129–55.

Lee SY. Reproductive health status and policy. Health Welf Policy Forum. 2022. 6:94–104. https://doi.org/10.23062/2022.06.8.

Lee YS., Choi SM., Kwon JH. Psychosocial predictors of infertile women's distress. J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2019. 23:136–46.

Maxwell E., Mathews M., Mulay S. The impact of access barriers on fertility treatment decision making: a qualitative study from the perspectives of patients and service providers. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018. 40:334–41.

Ministry of Employment and Labor. New 3-day infertility leave established… Up to 11 days of annual leave for new employees [Internet]. Sejong (Korea): Republic of Korea Policy Briefing;2017. [cited 2023 Oct 21]. Available from: https://www.korea.kr/news/policyNewsView.do?newsId=148845065#goList.

Ministry of Employment and Labor. Survey on work-life balance [Internet]. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Employment and Labor;2022. [cited 2024 Feb 25]. Available from: https://www.data.go.kr/data/15032836/fileData.do.

Ministry of Health and Welfare. ‘Expanding support for infertility treatment’, listening to opinions from the field of infertility treatment [Internet]. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Health and Welfare;2024. [cited 2024 Feb 27]. Available from: https://www.mohw.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10503010100&bid=0027&cg_code=.

Moon JH., Jeon BY. An analysis of outpatient uses and expenditure for infertility care. Korean J Health Econ Policy. 2022. 28:1–27. https://kiss-kstudy-com-ssl.openlink.knou.ac.kr:8443/Detail/Ar?key=3972199.

Mountz A. Women on the edge: workplace stress at universities in North America. Can Geogr. 2016. 60:205–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12277.

Musa S., Osman S. Risk profile of Qatari women treated for infertility in a tertiary hospital: a case-control study. Fertil Res Pract. 2020. 6:12.

Nam H., Lim SK., Kang MJ. Legislative trends and financial outlook for infertility treatment support. NABO Fisc Estim Tax Issues. 2023. 2:54–80. https://nabo.go.kr/q/8OWGTsb5.

Njagi P., Groot W., Arsenijevic J., Dyer S., Mburu G., Kiarie J. Financial costs of assisted reproductive technology for patients in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Open. 2023. 2023:hoad007.

Öztürk R., Herbell K., Morton J., Bloom T. "The worst time of my life": Treatment-related stress and unmet needs of women living with infertility. J Community Psychol. 2021. 49:1121–33.

Park JS., Lim JY., Kim EJ., Byeon BJ., Lee SY., Jang IS, et al. 2021 Family and Childbirth Survey - (Former) National Fertility and Family Health and Welfare Survey Research Report. Sejong (Korea): Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2023. https://www.kihasa.re.kr/publish/report/research/view?seq=60998.

Rudrappa S. Unintended infertility: labor markets, software workers, and fertility decision-making. Bergman K, Petok WD, editors. Psychological and medical perspectives on fertility care and sexual health. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier;2022. p. 205–12.

Ryu SJ. Infertility, the social context of deferred motherhood: a qualitative inquiry based on an online infertility community. J Asian Women. 2019. 58:5–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.14431/jaw.2019.08.58.2.5.

Seoul Metropolitan Government. Seoul City Policy News. Support for treatment costs for all infertile couples… egg freezing costs up to 2 million won. [Internet]. Seoul (Korea): Seoul Metropolitan Government;2023. [cited 2023 Oct 21]. Available from: https://www.seoul.go.kr/seoul/mediahub_view.do?articleNo=2007211&schDaesangVals=&schBunyaVals=&schNewsAreaCd=&schType=&schValue=&fetchStart=1.

Shin J. Sectoral differences in the relationship between employment and fertility among married female. KDIS Working Paper 2021; 21-11. Sejong (Korea): KDI School of Public Policy and Management;2021. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4054153.

Sinyavskaya O., Billingsley S. The importance of job characteristics to women's fertility intentions and behavior in Russia. Genus. 2015. 71:23–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/genus.71.1.23.

Statistics Korea. 2023 Birth statistics [Internet]. Daejeon (Korea): Statistics Korea;2024a. [cited 2024 Apr 14]. Available from: https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10301010000&bid=204&act=view&list_no=429586.

Statistics Korea. Economically active population survey [Internet]. Daejeon (Korea): Statistics Korea;2024b. [cited 2024 Feb 24]. Available from: https://www.index.go.kr/unity/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do;jsessionid=bw47r6X8wn51WQJ1erZ4XKoxK6R0YI-DDtwtoh_x.node11?idx_cd=1572.

World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11). Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Orga nization;2018.

Zhu C., Yan L., He C., Wang Y., Wu J., Chen L., Zhang J, et al. Incidence and risk factors of infertility among couples who desire a first and second child in Shanghai, China: a facility-based prospective cohort study. Reprod Health. 2022. 19:155.