J Neurocrit Care.  2022 Dec;15(2):79-87. 10.18700/jnc.220085.

Quantitative assessments of pupillary light reflexes in neurocritically ill patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

The pupillary light reflex (PLR) is a component of bedside neurological examinations in neurological intensive care units (neuroICUs). A quantitative pupillometer provides a non-invasive and objective pupil reactivity parameter clinically significant for changes in PLR in neuroICUs. This article reviews the physiology and importance of the PLR and the parameters of quantitative pupillometers. Moreover, this review discusses the clinical applications of quantitative pupillometers for post-cardiac arrest prognostication and monitoring of elevated intracranial pressure and neurological worsening in stroke, seizures, and other neurological diseases in the neuroICU. Quantitative pupillometry is a routine part of neurological examinations and an important monitoring tool for neurological diseases in neuroICUs.

Keyword

Abnormal pupillary function; Neurological examination; Assessment; Outcomes; Critical care

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Phases of the pupillary light reflex measured by a quantitative pupillometer. Latency is the time of onset of constriction following a light stimulus. The constriction velocity and maximum constriction velocity were calculated using the slope and maximal slope, respectively, during the constriction phase. During the dilation phase, dilation velocity was evaluated using the slope of the dilation phase. Max, maximum; Avg, average. Reprodued from Packiasabapathy et al. Can J Anaesth 2021;68:566-78 with permission of Springer Nature [16].

  • Fig. 2. Quantitative pupillometers devices and parameters. (A) Neuroptics NPiTM-200 and result screens. (B) NeuroLight-Algiscan and result screen. Reprodued from NeuroOptics (https://neuroptics.com/npi-200-pupillometer) and IDMED (https://www.idmed.fr/en/analgesia) with permission.


Reference

1. Dowlati E, Sarpong K, Kamande S, Carroll AH, Murray J, Wiley A, et al. Abnormal neurological pupil index is associated with malignant cerebral edema after mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion patients. Neurol Sci. 2021; 42:5139–48.
Article
2. Larson MD, Singh V. Portable infrared pupillometry in critical care. Crit Care. 2016; 20:161.
3. Larson MD, Behrends M. Portable infrared pupillometry: a review. Anesth Analg. 2015; 120:1242–53.
4. Bower MM, Sweidan AJ, Xu JC, Stern-Neze S, Yu W, Groysman LI. Quantitative pupillometry in the intensive care unit. J Intensive Care Med. 2021; 36:383–91.
Article
5. Taylor WR, Chen JW, Meltzer H, Gennarelli TA, Kelbch C, Knowlton S, et al. Quantitative pupillometry, a new technology: normative data and preliminary observations in patients with acute head injury. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98:205–13.
6. Zafar SF, Suarez JI. Automated pupillometer for monitoring the critically ill patient: a critical appraisal. J Crit Care. 2014; 29:599–603.
Article
7. Lussier BL, Olson DM, Aiyagari V. Automated pupillometry in neurocritical care: research and practice. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019; 19:71.
8. Rasulo FA, Togni T, Romagnoli S. Essential noninvasive multimodality neuromonitoring for the critically ill patient. Crit Care. 2020; 24:100.
Article
9. Oshorov AV, Alexandrova EV, Muradyan KR, Sosnovskaya OY, Sokolova EY, Savin IA. Pupillometry as a method for monitoring of pupillary light reflex in ICU patients. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N Burdenko. 2021; 85:117–23.
Article
10. Park JG, Moon CT, Park DS, Song SW. Clinical utility of an automated pupillometer in patients with acute brain lesion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015; 58:363–7.
Article
11. Osman M, Stutzman SE, Atem F, Olson D, Hicks AD, Ortega-Perez S, et al. Correlation of objective pupillometry to midline shift in acute stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019; 28:1902–10.
Article
12. Kim TJ, Ko SB. Implication of neurological pupil index for monitoring of brain edema. Acute Crit Care. 2018; 33:57–60.
13. Zhao W, Stutzman S, DaiWai O, Saju C, Wilson M, Aiyagari V. Inter-device reliability of the NPi-100 pupillometer. J Clin Neurosci. 2016; 33:79–82.
Article
14. Olson DM, Stutzman S, Saju C, Wilson M, Zhao W, Aiyagari V. Interrater reliability of pupillary assessments. Neurocrit Care. 2016; 24:251–7.
Article
15. Couret D, Boumaza D, Grisotto C, Triglia T, Pellegrini L, Ocquidant P, et al. Reliability of standard pupillometry practice in neurocritical care: an observational, double-blinded study. Crit Care. 2016; 20:99.
Article
16. Packiasabapathy S, Rangasamy V, Sadhasivam S. Pupillometry in perioperative medicine: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2021; 68:566–78.
Article
17. Chen JW, Gombart ZJ, Rogers S, Gardiner SK, Cecil S, Bullock RM. Pupillary reactivity as an early indicator of increased intracranial pressure: the introduction of the neurological pupil index. Surg Neurol Int. 2011; 2:82.
18. Olson DM, Fishel M. The use of automated pupillometry in critical care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2016; 28:101–7.
Article
19. Phillips SS, Mueller CM, Nogueira RG, Khalifa YM. A systematic review assessing the current state of automated pupillometry in the NeuroICU. Neurocrit Care. 2019; 31:142–61.
Article
20. Paulus J, Roquilly A, Beloeil H, Théraud J, Asehnoune K, Lejus C. Pupillary reflex measurement predicts insufficient analgesia before endotracheal suctioning in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2013; 17:R161.
Article
21. Constant I, Nghe MC, Boudet L, Berniere J, Schrayer S, Seeman R, et al. Reflex pupillary dilatation in response to skin incision and alfentanil in children anaesthetized with sevoflurane: a more sensitive measure of noxious stimulation than the commonly used variables. Br J Anaesth. 2006; 96:614–9.
Article
22. Wildemeersch D, Baeten M, Peeters N, Saldien V, Vercauteren M, Hans G. Pupillary dilation reflex and pupillary pain index evaluation during general anaesthesia: a pilot study. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018; 25:19–23.
23. Sabourdin N, Barrois J, Louvet N, Rigouzzo A, Guye ML, Dadure C, et al. Pupillometry-guided intraoperative remifentanil administration versus standard practice influences opioid use: a randomized study. Anesthesiology. 2017; 127:284–92.
24. Fratino S, Peluso L, Talamonti M, Menozzi M, Costa Hirai LA, Lobo FA, et al. Evaluation of nociception using quantitative pupillometry and skin conductance in critically ill unconscious patients: a pilot study. Brain Sci. 2021; 11:109.
Article
25. Vlaenderen DV, Hans G, Saldien V, Wildemeersch D. Pupillary reflex dilation and pain index evaluation during general anesthesia using sufentanil: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain Manag. 2022; 12:931–41.
Article
26. Sandroni C, Grippo A, Nolan JP. ERC-ESICM guidelines for prognostication after cardiac arrest: time for an update. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46:1901–3.
Article
27. Sandroni C, D'Arrigo S, Nolan JP. Prognostication after cardiac arrest. Crit Care. 2018; 22:150.
28. Suys T, Bouzat P, Marques-Vidal P, Sala N, Payen JF, Rossetti AO, et al. Automated quantitative pupillometry for the prognostication of coma after cardiac arrest. Neurocrit Care. 2014; 21:300–8.
Article
29. Riker RR, Sawyer ME, Fischman VG, May T, Lord C, Eldridge A, et al. Neurological pupil index and pupillary light reflex by pupillometry predict outcome early after cardiac arrest. Neurocrit Care. 2020; 32:152–61.
Article
30. Tamura T, Namiki J, Sugawara Y, Sekine K, Yo K, Kanaya T, et al. Quantitative assessment of pupillary light reflex for early prediction of outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a multicentre prospective observational study. Resuscitation. 2018; 131:108–13.
Article
31. Oddo M, Sandroni C, Citerio G, Miroz JP, Horn J, Rundgren M, et al. Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44:2102–11.
Article
32. Godau J, Bierwirth C, Rösche J, Bösel J. Quantitative infrared pupillometry in nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care. 2021; 35:113–20.
33. Godau J, Bharad K, Rösche J, Nagy G, Kästner S, Weber K, et al. Automated pupillometry for assessment of treatment success in nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care. 2022; 36:148–56.
Article
34. Yan S, Tu Z, Lu W, Zhang Q, He J, Li Z, et al. Clinical utility of an automated pupillometer for assessing and monitoring recipients of liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2009; 15:1718–27.
Article
35. Favre E, Bernini A, Morelli P, Pasquier J, Miroz JP, Abed-Maillard S, et al. Neuromonitoring of delirium with quantitative pupillometry in sedated mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2020; 24:66.
Article
36. Miroz JP, Ben-Hamouda N, Bernini A, Romagnosi F, Bongiovanni F, Roumy A, et al. Neurological pupil index for early prognostication after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Chest. 2020; 157:1167–74.
Article
37. Macchini E, Bertelli A, Bogossian EG, Annoni F, Minini A, Quispe Cornejo A, et al. Pain pupillary index to prognosticate unfavorable outcome in comatose cardiac arrest patients. Resuscitation. 2022; 176:125–31.
38. Kim TJ, Park SH, Jeong HB, Ha EJ, Cho WS, Kang HS, et al. Neurological pupil index as an indicator of neurological worsening in large hemispheric strokes. Neurocrit Care. 2020; 33:575–81.
Article
39. Lee H, Choi SH, Park B, Hong YH, Lee HB, Jeon SB. Quantitative assessments of pupillary light reflexes in hospital-onset unresponsiveness. BMC Neurol. 2021; 21:234.
Article
40. Ong C, Hutch M, Barra M, Kim A, Zafar S, Smirnakis S. Effects of osmotic therapy on pupil reactivity: quantification using pupillometry in critically ill neurologic patients. Neurocrit Care. 2019; 30:307–15.
Article
41. Peluso L, Ferlini L, Talamonti M, Ndieugnou Djangang N, Gouvea Bogossian E, Menozzi M, et al. Automated pupillometry for prediction of electroencephalographic reactivity in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study. Front Neurol. 2022; 13:867603.
Article
42. Rollins MD, Feiner JR, Lee JM, Shah S, Larson M. Pupillary effects of high-dose opioid quantified with infrared pupillometry. Anesthesiology. 2014; 121:1037–44.
43. Hou RH, Scaife J, Freeman C, Langley RW, Szabadi E, Bradshaw CM. Relationship between sedation and pupillary function: comparison of diazepam and diphenhydramine. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006; 61:752–60.
Article
44. Haddock JH, Mercante DE, Paccione R, Breaux JL, Jolley SE, Johnson JL, et al. Use of digital pupillometry to measure sedative response to propofol. Ochsner J. 2017; 17:250–3.
45. Wilson MH, Edsell M, Imray C, Wright A; Birmingham Medical Research Expeditionary Society. Changes in pupil dynamics at high altitude: an observational study using a handheld pupillometer. High Alt Med Biol. 2008; 9:319–25.
46. Jobanputra AM, Scharf MT, Androulakis IP, Sunderram J. Circadian disruption in critical illness. Front Neurol. 2020; 11:820.
Article
47. Loving RT, Kripke DF, Glazner LK. Circadian rhythms in the human pupil and eyelid. Am J Physiol. 1996; 271(2 Pt 2):R320–4.
48. Bertrand AL, Garcia JB, Viera EB, Santos AM, Bertrand RH. Pupillometry: the influence of gender and anxiety on the pain response. Pain Physician. 2013; 16:E257–66.
Full Text Links
  • JNC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr