Korean J Women Health Nurs.  2022 Jun;28(2):77-82. 10.4069/kjwhn.2022.06.08.1.

Strategies to improve the quality of reporting nursing research

• Song JE

• KMID: 2535424
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2022.06.08.1

Reference

References

1. Moher D. Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers. BMC Med. 2018; 16(1):233. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1226-0.

2. Moher D, Simera I, Schulz KF, Hoey J, Altman DG. Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research. BMC Med. 2008; 6:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-6-13.

3. Hirst A, Altman DG. Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e35621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035621.

4. O’Brien BC, West CP, Coverdale JH, Durning SJ, Roberts LW. On the use and value of reporting guidelines in health professions education research. Acad Med. 2020; 95(11):1619–1622. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003666.

5. Dewey M, Levine D, Bossuyt PM, Kressel HY. Impact and perceived value of journal reporting guidelines among Radiology authors and reviewers. Eur Radiol. 2019; 29(8):3986–3995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5980-3.

6. The Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network. Reporting guidelines for main study types [Internet]. Oxford: The UK EQUATOR Centre; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 3]. Available from: https://www.equator-network.org.

7. Prager EM, Chambers KE, Plotkin JL, McArthur DL, Bandrowski AE, Bansal N, et al. Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2019; 2(1):e1150. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1150.

8. Editorial Board of KJWHN. Instructions to Authors [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing; 2021 [cited 2022 May 20]. Available from: https://kjwhn.org/authors/authors.php.

9. Lee EJ, Song JE, Kim M, Kim S, Jun EM, Ahn S, et al. Analysis on Reports of Qualitative Researches Published in Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2012; 18(4):321–332. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2012.18.4.321.

10. Kim M, Cheon SH, Jun EM, Kim S, Song JE, Ahn S, et al. The quality of reporting of intervention studies in the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing (KJWHN): based on the TREND guidelines. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2013; 19(4):306–317. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2013.19.4.306.

11. Kim S, Oh HE, Song JE, Kim M, Ahn S, Lee EJ, et al. Analysis of reports on observational studies published in the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing based on the STROBE guideline. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2014; 20(4):287–296. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2014.20.4.287.

12. Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001; 322(7294):1115–1117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.

13. The EQUATOR Network. EQUATOR Reporting Guideline Decision Tree [Internet]. Oxford: The UK EQUATOR Centre; 2016 [cited 2022 May 20]. Available from: https://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/20160226-RG-decision-tree-for-Wizard-CC-BY-26-February-2016.pdf.

14. The EQUATOR Network. The EQUATOR Wizard: a new tool to help authors find the right reporting guideline [Internet]. Oxford: The UK EQUATOR Centre; 2015 [cited 2022 May 20]. Available from: http://www.equator-network.org/2015/12/17/findtherightreportingguideline/.

15. Kearney MH. Hoping for a TREND toward PRISMA: the variety and value of research reporting guidelines. Res Nurs Health. 2014; 37(2):85–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21591.

16. Struthers C, Harwood J, de Beyer JA, Dhiman P, Logullo P, Schlüssel M. GoodReports: developing a website to help health researchers find and use reporting guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021; 21(1):217. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01402-x.