Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg.  2021 Dec;64(12):922-927. 10.3342/kjorl-hns.2021.00381.

Evaluation of Ultrasonography and CT for Imaging of Head and Neck Pilomatricoma in Children and Adolescents

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
  • 3Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
  • 4Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea

Abstract

Background and Objectives
Pilomatricoma is a frequently diagnosed skin lesion of the head and neck that may often be misdiagnosed as other skin lesions. This study evaluated whether ultrasonography (USG) or computed tomography (CT) is the most helpful imaging modality for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of pilomatricoma in head and neck regions of children and adolescents.
Subjects and Method
A retrospective review was conducted for 59 patients with pilomatricoma under the age of 19 years. All cases were pathologically confirmed with pilomatricoma in the head or neck.
Results
Preoperative imaging examinations were performed with USG in six cases and with CT in nine cases. The accuracy of preoperative diagnosis was compared between three groups: 1) with clinical findings only, 2) with USG, and 3) with CT. The correct preoperative diagnosis was made in 18 (30.5%) of the total of 59 cases. Using only clinical findings, 10 (22.7%) out of 44 patients were diagnosed as pilomatricoma. With the addition of USG, pilomatricoma was diagnosed in 1 (16.7%) out of six cases, whereas with the addition of CT, 7 (77.8%) out of 9 cases (77.8%) were diagnosed correctly. Preoperative diagnosis of pilomatricoma with CT imaging was more accurate than clinical findings only (vs. CT; odds ratio [OR]=11.900, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.126-66.615; p=0.001) or USG (vs. CT; OR=17.500, 95% CI 1.223-250.357; p=0.020).
Conclusion
In the preoperative diagnosis of pilomatricoma, imaging modalities such as CT and USG are helpful, with CT offering higher diagnostic accuracy and USG procedural benefits in younger children.

Keyword

Adolescent; Children; Computed tomography; Pilomatricoma; Ultrasonography.
Full Text Links
  • KJORL-HN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr