Healthc Inform Res.  2021 Oct;27(4):267-278. 10.4258/hir.2021.27.4.267.

Mobile Health Technology and Healthcare Providers: Systemic Barriers to Adoption

Affiliations
  • 1Clinical Education Research Center, Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  • 2Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 3Department of Health Information Technology, Faculty of Paramedicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
  • 4Amol Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

Abstract


Objectives
Despite the growing use of mobile health (mHealth), certain barriers seem to be hindering the use of mHealth applications in healthcare. This article presents a systematic review of the literature on barriers associated with mHealth reported by healthcare professionals.
Methods
This systematic review was carried out to identify studies published from January 2015 to December 2019 by searching four electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar). Studies were included if they reported perceived barriers to the adoption of mHealth from healthcare providers’ perspectives. Content analysis and categorization of barriers were performed based on a focus group discussion that explored researchers’ knowledge and experiences.
Results
Among the 273 papers retrieved through the search strategy, 18 works were selected and 18 barriers were identified. The relevant barriers were categorized into three main groups: technical, individual, and healthcare system. Security and privacy concerns from the category of technical barriers, knowledge and limited literacy from the category of individual barriers, and economic and financial factors from the category of healthcare system barriers were chosen as three of the most important challenges related to the adoption of mHealth described in the included publications.
Conclusions
mHealth adoption is a complex and multi-dimensional process that is widely implemented to increase access to healthcare services. However, it is influenced by various factors and barriers. Understanding the barriers to adoption of mHealth applications among providers, and engaging them in the adoption process will be important for the successful deployment of these applications.

Keyword

Mobile Health, Adoption, Mobile Applications, Health Personnel

Figure

  • Figure 1 Literature search flow diagram.

  • Figure 2 Barriers to mHealth adoption by healthcare providers.


Reference

References

1. Byambasuren O, Beller E, Glasziou P. Current knowledge and adoption of mobile health apps among Australian general practitioners: survey study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(6):e13199.
Article
2. Gagnon MP, Ngangue P, Payne-Gagnon J, Desmartis M. m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 23(1):212–20.
Article
3. Garavand A, Samadbeik M, Kafashi M, Abhari S. Acceptance of health information technologies, acceptance of mobile health: a review article. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2017; 7(4):403–8.
4. Ventola CL. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. P T. 2014; 39(5):356–64.
5. Hamilton EC, Saiyed F, Miller CC 3rd, Eguia A, Fonseca AC, Baum GP, et al. The digital divide in adoption and use of mobile health technology among caregivers of pediatric surgery patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 53(8):1478–93.
Article
6. Baniasadi T, Niakan Kalhori SR, Ayyoubzadeh SM, Zakerabasali S, Pourmohamadkhan M. Study of challenges to utilise mobile-based health care monitoring systems: a descriptive literature review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018; 24(10):661–8.
Article
7. Zahmatkeshan M, Zakerabasali S, Farjam M, Gholampour Y, Seraji M, Yazdani A. The use of mobile health interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: a descriptive literature review. J Med Life. 2021; 14(2):131–41.
Article
8. Winters N, Langer L, Geniets A. Scoping review assessing the evidence used to support the adoption of mobile health (mHealth) technologies for the education and training of community health workers (CHWs) in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(7):e019827.
Article
9. Kaphle S, Chaturvedi S, Chaudhuri I, Krishnan R, Lesh N. Adoption and usage of mHealth technology on quality and experience of care provided by frontline workers: observations from rural India. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015; 3(2):e61.
Article
10. Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Car J, Pagliari C, Pluye P, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst. 2012; 36(1):241–77.
Article
11. Lluch M. Healthcare professionals’ organisational barriers to health information technologies: a literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2011; 80(12):849–62.
12. Nilsen ER, Dugstad J, Eide H, Gullslett MK, Eide T. Exploring resistance to implementation of welfare technology in municipal healthcare services: a longitudinal case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16(1):657.
Article
13. O’Connor S, Hanlon P, O’Donnell CA, Garcia S, Glanville J, Mair FS. Barriers and facilitators to patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: protocol of a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(9):e010895.
Article
14. Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018; 24(1):4–12.
Article
15. Adibi S. Link technologies and BlackBerry mobile health (mHealth) solutions: a review. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2012; 16(4):586–97.
Article
16. Godoe P, Johansen T. Understanding adoption of new technologies: technology readiness and technology acceptance as an integrated concept. J Eur Psychol Stud. 2012; 3(1):38–52.
Article
17. Laxman K, Krishnan SB, Dhillon JS. Barriers to adoption of consumer health informatics applications for health self management. Health Sci J. 2015; 9(5):7.
18. Gleason AW. mHealth: opportunities for transforming global health care and barriers to adoption. J Electron Resour Med Libr. 2015; 12(2):114–25.
19. O’Connor Y, O’Donoghue J. Contextual barriers to mobile health technology in African Countries: a perspective piece. J Mob Technol Med. 2015; 4(1):31–4.
20. Medhanyie AA, Little A, Yebyo H, Spigt M, Tadesse K, Blanco R, et al. Health workers’ experiences, barriers, preferences and motivating factors in using mHealth forms in Ethiopia. Hum Resour Health. 2015; 13(1):2.
Article
21. Lavariega JC, Garza R, Gomez LG, Lara-Diaz VJ, Silva-Cavazos MJ. EEMI: an electronic health record for Pediatricians: Adoption barriers, services and use in Mexico. Int J Healthc Inf Syst Inform. 2016; 11(3):57–69.
22. Rajan JV, Moura J, Gourley G, Kiso K, Sizilio A, Cortez AM, et al. Understanding the barriers to successful adoption and use of a mobile health information system in a community health center in São Paulo, Brazil: a cohort study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016; 16(1):146.
Article
23. Nebeker C, Murray K, Holub C, Haughton J, Arredondo EM. Acceptance of mobile health in communities underrepresented in biomedical research: barriers and ethical considerations for scientists. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017; 5(6):e87.
Article
24. Kao CK, Liebovitz DM. Consumer mobile health apps: current state, barriers, and future directions. PM R. 2017; 9(5S):S106–S115.
Article
25. van Heerden A, Harris DM, van Rooyen H, Barnabas RV, Ramanathan N, Ngcobo N, et al. Perceived mHealth barriers and benefits for home-based HIV testing and counseling and other care: qualitative findings from health officials, community health workers, and persons living with HIV in South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2017; 183:97–105.
Article
26. Abelson JS, Kaufman E, Symer M, Peters A, Charlson M, Yeo H. Barriers and benefits to using mobile health technology after operation: a qualitative study. Surgery. 2017; 162(3):605–11.
Article
27. Faber S, van Geenhuizen M, de Reuver M. eHealth adoption factors in medical hospitals: a focus on the Netherlands. Int J Med Inform. 2017; 100:77–89.
Article
28. Graves M, Doucet S, Dube A, Johnson M. Health professionals’ and patients’ perceived barriers and facilitators to collaborating when communicating through the use of information and communication technologies. J Interprof Educ Pract. 2018; 10:85–91.
Article
29. Rassi C, Gore-Langton GR, Gidudu Walimbwa B, Strachan CE, King R, Basharat S, et al. Improving health worker performance through text messaging: a mixed-methods evaluation of a pilot intervention designed to increase coverage of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in West Nile, Uganda. PLoS One. 2018; 13(9):e0203554.
Article
30. Spann A, Stewart E. Barriers and facilitators of older people’s mHealth usage: a qualitative review of older people’s views. Hum Technol. 2018; 14(3):264–96.
Article
31. Bally EL, Cesuroglu T. Toward integration of mHealth in primary care in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis of stakeholder perspectives. Front Public Health. 2020; 7:407.
Article
32. Zhou L, Bao J, Watzlaf V, Parmanto B. Barriers to and facilitators of the use of mobile health apps from a security perspective: mixed-methods study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(4):e11223.
Article
33. Anastasiadou D, Folkvord F, Serrano-Troncoso E, Lupianez-Villanueva F. Mobile health adoption in mental health: user experience of a mobile health app for patients with an eating disorder. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(6):e12920.
Article
34. Wahab SA, Rose RC, Osman SI. Defining the concepts of technology and technology transfer: a literature analysis. Int Bus Res. 2012; 5(1):61–71.
Article
35. Steinhubl SR, Muse ED, Topol EJ. The emerging field of mobile health. Sci Transl Med. 2015; 7(283):283rv3.
Article
36. Martinez-Perez B, de la Torre-Diez I, Lopez-Coronado M. Privacy and security in mobile health apps: a review and recommendations. J Med Syst. 2015; 39(1):181.
Article
37. Bajwa M. mHealth security. Pak J Med Sci. 2014; 30(4):904–7.
Article
38. Zahra F, Hussain A, Mohd H. Usability factors of mobile health application for chronic diseases. AIP Conf Proc. 2016; 1761(1):020108.
Article
39. Dunlop M, Brewster S. The challenge of mobile devices for human computer interaction. Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 2002; 6:235–6.
Article
40. LeRouge C, Garfield MJ. Crossing the telemedicine chasm: have the U.S. barriers to widespread adoption of telemedicine been significantly reduced? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013; 10(12):6472–84.
Article
41. Weinstein RS, Lopez AM, Joseph BA, Erps KA, Holcomb M, Barker GP, et al. Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: opportunities and barriers. Am J Med. 2014; 127(3):183–7.
Article
42. Mehdipour Y, Ebrahimi S, Khammarnia M, Alipour J, Karimi A. The acceptance of mobile health services by physicians: the case of Iran. Shiraz E-Med J. 2018; 19(Suppl):e66316.
Article
43. Sands DZ. Help for physicians contemplating use of e-mail with patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004; 11(4):268–9.
Article
44. McDaniel AM, Schutte DL, Keller LO. Consumer health informatics: from genomics to population health. Nurs Outlook. 2008; 56(5):216–223e3.
Article
45. Linsky A, Zimmerman KM. Provider and system-level barriers to deprescribing: interconnected problems and solutions. Public Policy Aging Rep. 2018; 28(4):129–33.
Article
46. Zakerabasali S, Safdari R, Kadivar M, Rostam Niakan Kalhori S, Mokhtaran M, Karbasi Z, et al. Neonatal abstinence syndrome: a systematic review of current databases and registries. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 34(6):979–92.
Article
47. Waegemann CP. mHealth: the next generation of telemedicine? Telemed J E Health. 2010; 16(1):23–5.
48. Adebesin F, Kotze P, Van Greunen D, Foster R. Barriers & challenges to the adoption of E-Health standards in Africa. In : Proceedings of Conference on Health Informatics South Africa (HISA); 2013 Jul 3–5; Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
49. Menachemi N, Matthews M, Ford EW, Hikmet N, Brooks RG. The relationship between local hospital IT capabilities and physician EMR adoption. J Med Syst. 2009; 33(5):329–35.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr