1. Bonciu C. Title, abstract and keywords: essential issues in medical bibliographic research. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2005; 109:916–26.
2. Cooper ID. Bibliometrics basics. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015; 103:217–8.
Article
3. Mathur VP, Sharma A. Impact factor and other standardized measures of journal citation: a perspective. Indian J Dent Res. 2009; 20:81–5.
Article
4. Baheti AD, Bhargava P. Altmetrics: a measure of social attention toward scientific research. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2017; 46:391–2.
Article
5. Zahedi Z, Costas R. General discussion of data quality challenges in social media metrics: extensive comparison of four major altmetric data aggregators. PLoS One. 2018; 13:e0197326.
Article
6. Araujo R, Sorensen AA, Konkiel S, Bloem BR. Top altmetric scores in the Parkinson’s disease literature. J Parkinsons Dis. 2017; 7:81–7.
7. Kim ES, Yoon DY, Kim HJ, Lee K, Kim Y, Bae JS, et al. The most mentioned neuroimaging articles in online media: a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 articles with the highest Altmetric Attention Scores. Acta Radiol. 2019; 60:1680–6.
Article
8. Kim HJ, Yoon DY, Kim ES, Yun EJ, Jeon HJ, Lee JY, et al. The most mentioned neurointervention articles in online media: a bibliometric analysis of the top 101 articles with the highest altmetric attention scores. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019; 11:528–32.
Article
9. Marincek C, Franchignoni F. Some thoughts on bibliometrics, usage metrics and altmetrics concerning the International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. Int J Rehabil Res. 2019; 42:193–5.
Article
10. Niehaus WN, Silver JK, Katz MS. The PM&R Journal implements a social media strategy to disseminate research and track alternative metrics in physical medicine and rehabilitation. PM R. 2018; 10:538–43.
11. Knowlton SE, Paganoni S, Niehaus W, Verduzco-Gutierrez M, Sharma R, Iaccarino MA, et al. Measuring the impact of research using conventional and alternative metrics. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 98:331–8.
Article
12. Huh S. The elevation of Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine to the status of an international journal after adopting an English-only policy. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015; 39:661–6.
13. Lee YH, Jun Sung Park JS, Yi TI, Shin JC. A study of overall compositions and yearly trend of the Journal of Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine for calender years 1977 through 1993. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 1995; 19:417–24.
14. Kim JH, Kim JS. Statistical methods used in the Journal of Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 1998; 22:46–55.
15. Kim J, Yoon S, Kang JJ, Han K, Kim JM, Kim SK. Research designs and statistical methods trends in the Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017; 41:475–82.
Article
16. Lim JK, Han JY, Lee HC, Lee J, Chung H, Kim JM, et al. Analysis of publication status of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the Korean academy of rehabilitation medicine. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013; 37:413–9.
Article
18. Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ. 1997; 314:498–502.
Article
19. Kumar A. Is “Impact” the “Factor” that matters…? (Part I). J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2018; 22:95–6.
Article