J Bone Metab.  2019 Feb;26(1):3-12. 10.11005/jbm.2019.26.1.3.

The Function of the Vitamin D Receptor and a Possible Role of Enhancer RNA in Epigenomic Regulation of Target Genes: Implications for Bone Metabolism

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Molecular Endocrinology, Fujii Memorial Institute of Medical Sciences, Institute of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
  • 2Center for Regional Cooperation, Iwaki Meisei University, Iwaki, Japan. shigeaki.kato@iwakimu.ac.jp, uskato0525@gmail.com
  • 3Research Institute of Innovative Medicine, Tokiwa Foundation, Jyoban Kamiyunagayamachi, Iwaki, Japan.

Abstract

Vitamin D (VD) is essential for bone health, and VD or its analogues are widely used in clinics to ameliorate bone loss. The targets and mode of VD anti-osteoporotic actions appear to be different from those of other classes of drugs modulating bone remodeling. VD exerts its biological activities through the nuclear VD receptor (VDR)-mediated transcriptional regulation of target mRNA and non-coding RNA genes. VD-induced gene regulation involves epigenetic modifications of chromatin conformation at the target loci as well as reconfiguration of higher-order chromosomal organization through VDR-mediated recruitment of various regulatory factors. Enhancer RNAs (eRNA), a class of non-coding enhancer-derived RNAs, have recently emerged as VDR target gene candidates that act through reorganization of chromatin looping to induce enhancer-promoter interaction in activation of mRNA-encoding genes. This review outlines the molecular mechanisms of VD actions mediated by the VDR and suggests novel function of eRNAs in VDR transactivation.

Keyword

Chromatin reorganization; Enhancer RNA; Non-coding RNA; Vitamin D; Vitamin D receptor

MeSH Terms

Bone Remodeling
Chromatin
Epigenomics*
Metabolism*
Receptors, Calcitriol*
RNA*
RNA, Messenger
RNA, Untranslated
Transcriptional Activation
Vitamin D*
Vitamins*
Chromatin
RNA
RNA, Messenger
RNA, Untranslated
Receptors, Calcitriol
Vitamin D
Vitamins

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Schematic representation of vitamin D signaling and its related disease. Vitamin D is converted into an active form as a vitamin D receptor (VDR) ligand for gene regulation. Deficiency of dietary vitamin D as well as genetic mutations inducing malfunction of 1α-hydroxylase and VDR causes rachitic abnormality. VDDRI, vitamin D-dependent rickets type 1; VDDRII, vitamin D-dependent rickets type 2; RXR, retinoid X receptor; VDRE, vitamin D response element; 1α,25(OH)2D3, 1α,25-dihydroxy-vitamin Dw.

  • Fig. 2 Schematic representation of vitamin D target genes. The target genes for vitamin D receptor (VDR) were considered to be limited to the mRNA genes encoding proteins. However, recent progress in human genome by means of the next generation DNA sequencers have uncovered that more than 80% of the human genome encode non-coding RNAs (ncRNA). As some classes of the ncRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II, VDR is assumed to transcribe a set of ncRNAs as target genes. RXR, retinoid X receptor; VDRE, vitamin D response element; eRNA, enhancer RNA; IncRNA, long non-coding RNA; miRNA, microRNA.

  • Fig. 3 Schematic representation of chromatin reorganization and epigenetic regulators. Chromatin reorganization is achieved through histone modification and chromatin remodeling. The specific combination of histone modifications direct the state of chromatin activation. The chromatin remodelers and histone modifiers form in general multi-subunit complexes. TFTC, T cell transcription factor; TRRAP, transformation/transcription domain-associated protein; GCN5, general control of amino acid synthesis 5; OGT, O-GlcNAc transferase; MLL5, mixed lineage leukemia 5; LSD1, lysine-specific demethylase 1; RetCoR, RNA helicase DHX30; CoREST, repressor element 1 silencing transcription factor corepressor; HDM, histone demethylase; HDAC, histone deacetylase; SWI, switching defective; SNF, sucrose nonfermenting; BRG, Brahma-related gene; BRM, Brahma; NuRD, nucleosome remodelling and deacetylase.

  • Fig. 4 Schematic representation of enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) transcription from enhancer. One class of non-coding RNAs is eRNA, that is transcribed from strong enhancers (not all enhancers) like super enhancers. The expression levels of eRNAs are very low and the transcription start sites are multiple and ambiguous. TF, transcription factor; TAD, topologically associating domain; CTCF, CCCTC-binding factor.

  • Fig. 5 Property of enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). The currently known information of eRNAs is shown.

  • Fig. 6 Schematic representation of chromatin looping by enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) target mRNA genes. Chromatin looping is stabilized by cohesion complex by aid of eRNAs for efficient transcription of the VDR target mRNA genes. POL, polymerase; RXR, retinoid X receptor; VDRE, vitamin D response element.


Reference

1. Morris HA, Anderson PH. Autocrine and paracrine actions of vitamin D. Clin Biochem Rev. 2010; 31:129–138.
2. Feldman D, Malloy PJ. Mutations in the vitamin D receptor and hereditary vitamin D-resistant rickets. Bonekey Rep. 2014; 3:510.
Article
3. Kato S. The function of vitamin D receptor in vitamin D action. J Biochem. 2000; 127:717–722.
Article
4. Haussler MR, Whitfield GK, Haussler CA, et al. The nuclear vitamin D receptor: biological and molecular regulatory properties revealed. J Bone Miner Res. 1998; 13:325–349.
Article
5. Matsumoto T, Ito M, Hayashi Y, et al. A new active vitamin D3 analog, eldecalcitol, prevents the risk of osteoporotic fractures-a randomized, active comparator, double-blind study. Bone. 2011; 49:605–612.
Article
6. Andersson R, Gebhard C, Miguel-Escalada I, et al. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature. 2014; 507:455–461.
Article
7. Djebali S, Davis CA, Merkel A, et al. Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature. 2012; 489:101–108.
8. Takeyama K, Kitanaka S, Sato T, et al. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 1alpha-hydroxylase and vitamin D synthesis. Science. 1997; 277:1827–1830.
Article
9. Kitanaka S, Takeyama K, Murayama A, et al. Inactivating mutations in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 1alpha-hydroxylase gene in patients with pseudovitamin D-deficiency rickets. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338:653–661.
Article
10. Yoshizawa T, Handa Y, Uematsu Y, et al. Mice lacking the vitamin D receptor exhibit impaired bone formation, uterine hypoplasia and growth retardation after weaning. Nat Genet. 1997; 16:391–396.
Article
11. Mangelsdorf DJ, Thummel C, Beato M, et al. The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell. 1995; 83:835–839.
Article
12. Pike JW. Genome-wide principles of gene regulation by the vitamin D receptor and its activating ligand. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011; 347:3–10.
Article
13. Lupien M, Eeckhoute J, Meyer CA, et al. FoxA1 translates epigenetic signatures into enhancer-driven lineage-specific transcription. Cell. 2008; 132:958–970.
Article
14. Zaret KS, Mango SE. Pioneer transcription factors, chromatin dynamics, and cell fate control. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016; 37:76–81.
Article
15. Seuter S, Neme A, Carlberg C. Epigenomic PU.1-VDR crosstalk modulates vitamin D signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2017; 1860:405–415.
Article
16. Rachez C, Suldan Z, Ward J, et al. A novel protein complex that interacts with the vitamin D3 receptor in a ligand-dependent manner and enhances VDR transactivation in a cell-free system. Genes Dev. 1998; 12:1787–1800.
Article
17. Rosenfeld MG, Lunyak VV, Glass CK. Sensors and signals: a coactivator/corepressor/epigenetic code for integrating signal-dependent programs of transcriptional response. Genes Dev. 2006; 20:1405–1428.
Article
18. Kato S, Yokoyama A, Fujiki R. Nuclear receptor coregulators merge transcriptional coregulation with epigenetic regulation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2011; 36:272–281.
Article
19. Seuter S, Heikkinen S, Carlberg C. Chromatin acetylation at transcription start sites and vitamin D receptor binding regions relates to effects of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and histone deacetylase inhibitors on gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41:110–124.
Article
20. Battaglia S, Karasik E, Gillard B, et al. LSD1 dual function in mediating epigenetic corruption of the vitamin D signaling in prostate cancer. Clin Epigenetics. 2017; 9:82.
Article
21. Masuyama R, Nakaya Y, Tanaka S, et al. Dietary phosphorus restriction reverses the impaired bone mineralization in vitamin D receptor knockout mice. Endocrinology. 2001; 142:494–497.
Article
22. Yamamoto Y, Yoshizawa T, Fukuda T, et al. Vitamin D receptor in osteoblasts is a negative regulator of bone mass control. Endocrinology. 2013; 154:1008–1020.
Article
23. Uenishi K, Tokiwa M, Kato S, et al. Stimulation of intestinal calcium absorption by orally administrated vitamin D3 compounds: a prospective open-label randomized trial in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2018; 29:723–732.
Article
24. Bouillon R, Carmeliet G, Verlinden L, et al. Vitamin D and human health: lessons from vitamin D receptor null mice. Endocr Rev. 2008; 29:726–776.
Article
25. Lieben L, Masuyama R, Torrekens S, et al. Normocalcemia is maintained in mice under conditions of calcium malabsorption by vitamin D-induced inhibition of bone mineralization. J Clin Invest. 2012; 122:1803–1815.
Article
26. Nakamura T, Takano T, Fukunaga M, et al. Eldecalcitol is more effective for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures than alfacalcidol. J Bone Miner Metab. 2013; 31:417–422.
Article
27. Sakai Y, Kishimoto J, Demay MB. Metabolic and cellular analysis of alopecia in vitamin D receptor knockout mice. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107:961–966.
Article
28. Esteller M. Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 12:861–874.
Article
29. Meyer MB, Benkusky NA, Lee CH, et al. Genomic determinants of gene regulation by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 during osteoblast-lineage cell differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2014; 289:19539–19554.
Article
30. Seuter S, Pehkonen P, Heikkinen S, et al. Dynamics of 1alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-dependent chromatin accessibility of early vitamin D receptor target genes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013; 1829:1266–1275.
Article
31. Luger K, Dechassa ML, Tremethick DJ. New insights into nucleosome and chromatin structure: an ordered state or a disordered affair? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012; 13:436–447.
Article
32. Allis CD, Berger SL, Cote J, et al. New nomenclature for chromatin-modifying enzymes. Cell. 2007; 131:633–636.
Article
33. Suganuma T, Workman JL. Signals and combinatorial functions of histone modifications. Annu Rev Biochem. 2011; 80:473–499.
Article
34. Tan M, Luo H, Lee S, et al. Identification of 67 histone marks and histone lysine crotonylation as a new type of histone modification. Cell. 2011; 146:1016–1028.
Article
35. Fujiki R, Hashiba W, Sekine H, et al. GlcNAcylation of histone H2B facilitates its monoubiquitination. Nature. 2011; 480:557–560.
Article
36. Baba A, Ohtake F, Okuno Y, et al. PKA-dependent regulation of the histone lysine demethylase complex PHF2-ARID5B. Nat Cell Biol. 2011; 13:668–675.
Article
37. Greer EL, Shi Y. Histone methylation: a dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13:343–357.
Article
38. Chen T, Dent SY. Chromatin modifiers and remodellers: regulators of cellular differentiation. Nat Rev Genet. 2014; 15:93–106.
Article
39. Kato S, Ishii T, Kouzmenko A. Point mutations in an epigenetic factor lead to multiple types of bone tumors: role of H3.3 histone variant in bone development and disease. Bonekey Rep. 2015; 4:715.
Article
40. Burgess RJ, Zhang Z. Histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly and human disease. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013; 20:14–22.
Article
41. Sawatsubashi S, Murata T, Lim J, et al. A histone chaperone, DEK, transcriptionally coactivates a nuclear receptor. Genes Dev. 2010; 24:159–170.
Article
42. Metzger E, Wissmann M, Yin N, et al. LSD1 demethylates repressive histone marks to promote androgen-receptor-dependent transcription. Nature. 2005; 437:436–439.
Article
43. Ren B, Dixon JR. A CRISPR connection between chromatin topology and genetic disorders. Cell. 2015; 161:955–957.
Article
44. Hnisz D, Shrinivas K, Young RA, et al. A phase separation model for transcriptional control. Cell. 2017; 169:13–23.
Article
45. Kim TK, Shiekhattar R. Architectural and functional commonalities between enhancers and promoters. Cell. 2015; 162:948–959.
Article
46. Neme A, Seuter S, Carlberg C. Vitamin D-dependent chromatin association of CTCF in human monocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016; 1859:1380–1388.
Article
47. Li W, Notani D, Rosenfeld MG. Enhancers as non-coding RNA transcription units: recent insights and future perspectives. Nat Rev Genet. 2016; 17:207–223.
Article
48. Li W, Notani D, Ma Q, et al. Functional roles of enhancer RNAs for oestrogen-dependent transcriptional activation. Nature. 2013; 498:516–520.
Article
49. Lam MT, Cho H, Lesch HP, et al. Rev-Erbs repress macrophage gene expression by inhibiting enhancer-directed transcription. Nature. 2013; 498:511–515.
Article
50. Sawatsubashi S, Joko Y, Fukumoto S, et al. Development of versatile non-homologous end joining-based knock-in module for genome editing. Sci Rep. 2018; 8:593.
Article
51. Meyer MB, Goetsch PD, Pike JW. A downstream intergenic cluster of regulatory enhancers contributes to the induction of CYP24A1 expression by 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285:15599–15610.
Article
52. Tsai PF, Dell'Orso S, Rodriguez J, et al. A muscle-specific enhancer RNA mediates cohesin recruitment and regulates transcription in trans. Mol Cell. 2018; 71:129–141.
Article
53. Weintraub AS, Li CH, Zamudio AV, et al. YY1 Is a structural regulator of enhancer-promoter loops. Cell. 2017; 171:1573–1588.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr