1. Zeimer RC, Mori MT, Khoobehi B. Feasibility test of a new method to measure retinal thickness noninvasively. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989; 30:2099–105.
2. Gieser JP, Rusin MM, Mori M, et al. Clinical assessment of the macular by retinal topography and thickness mapping. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997; 124:648–60.
3. Polito A, Shah SM, Haller JA, et al. Comparision between retinal thickness analyzer and optical coherence tomography for abdominal of foveal thickness in eyes with macular disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002; 134:240–51.
4. Puliafito CA, Hee MR, Schuman JS, et al. Optical coherence abdominal of ocular disease. Thorofare, NJ: Slack;1996. p. 369–74.
5. Muscat S, Parks S, Kemp E, Keating D. Repeatability and abdominal of macular thickness measurements with the Humphrey system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43:490–5.
6. Gurses-Ozden R, Teng C, Vessani R, et al. Macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement reproducibility using abdominalal coherence tomography (OCT-3). J Glaucoma. 2004; 13:238–44.
7. Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using Stratus OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45:1716–24.
8. Polito A, Del Borrello M, Isola M, et al. Repeatability and abdominal of fast macular thickness mapping with Stratus abdominal coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005; 123:1330–7.
9. Hangai M, Ojima Y, Gotoh N, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of macular holes with high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:763–73.
Article
10. Ahlers C, Michels S, Beckendorf A, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of pigment epithelial detachment in age-related macular degeneration using optical coherence tomography, retinal thickness analysis and topographic angiography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006; 244:1233–9.
Article
11. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Comparison of abdominal measurements between time domain and specral domain abdominal coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49:4893–7.
12. Oh SB, Cho WB, Moon JW, Kim HC, et al. Repeatability and agreement of macular thickness measurement using time domain OCT and spectral domain OCT in normal subjects. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2009; 50:710–6.
Article
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing abdominal between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1:307–10.
14. Bland JM. Comparing within-subject variances in a study to compare two methods of measurement. Available at. http://www-users.york.ac.uk/∼mb55/meas/compsd.pdf.
15. Massin P, Vicaut E, Haouchine B, et al. Reproducibility of retinal mapping using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119:1135–42.
Article
16. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Pshychol Bull. 1979; 86:420–8.
Article
17. Hendrickson A, Drucker D. The development of parafoveal and midperipheral human retina. Behav Brain Res. 1992; 49:21–31.
Article
18. Spraul CW, Lang GE, Grossniklaus HE. Morphometric analysis of the choroid, Bruch's membrane, and retinal pigment abdominal in eyes with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996; 37:2724–35.