J Breast Cancer.  2016 Jun;19(2):185-190. 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.2.185.

Predictors of Recurrent Ductal Carcinoma In Situ after Breast-Conserving Surgery

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pathology, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea. kpark@paik.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Surgery, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Local recurrence is a major concern in patients who have undergone surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The present study assessed whether the expression levels of hormone receptors, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67, as well as resection margin status, tumor grade, age at diagnosis, and adjuvant hormonal therapy and radiotherapy (RT) are associated with recurrence in women with DCIS.
METHODS
In total, 111 patients with DCIS were included in the present study. The invasive and noninvasive recurrence events were recorded. The clinicopathological features; resection margins; administration of hormonal therapy and RT; expression statuses of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2; Ki-67 expression; and molecular subtypes were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the risk factors for recurrence.
RESULTS
Recurrence was noted in 27 of 111 cases (24.3%). Involvement of resection margins, low tumor grade, high Ki-67 expression, and RT were independently associated with an increase in the recurrence rate (p<0.05, Pearson chi-square test). The recurrence rate was not significantly associated with patient age; ER, PR, and HER2 statuses; molecular subtype; and hormonal therapy.
CONCLUSION
The results of the present study suggested that the involvement of resection margins, low tumor grade, high Ki-67 index, and the absence of adjuvant RT were independently associated with increased recurrence in patients with DCIS. Future studies should be conducted in a larger cohort of patients to further improve the identification of patients at high-risk for DCIS recurrence.

Keyword

Breast; Carcinoma; Intraductal; Recurrence

MeSH Terms

Breast
Carcinoma, Ductal*
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating*
Cohort Studies
Diagnosis
Estrogens
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Mastectomy, Segmental*
Radiotherapy
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
Receptors, Progesterone
Recurrence
Risk Factors
Estrogens
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
Receptors, Progesterone

Reference

1. Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94:1546–1554. PMID: 12381707.
Article
2. Rakovitch E, Pignol JP, Chartier C, Hanna W, Kahn H, Wong J, et al. The management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a screened population-based analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007; 101:335–347. PMID: 16838110.
Article
3. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Martino S, Lewinsky BS, Craig PH, Beron PJ, et al. Outcome after invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16:1367–1373. PMID: 9552039.
Article
4. Solin LJ, Fourquet A, McCormick B, Haffty B, Recht A, Schultz DJ, et al. Salvage treatment for local recurrence following breast-conserving surgery and definitive irradiation for ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994; 30:3–9. PMID: 8083125.
Article
5. Boxer MM, Delaney GP, Chua BH. A review of the management of ductal carcinoma in situ following breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2013; 22:1019–1025. PMID: 24070852.
Article
6. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Craig PH, Waisman JR, Lewinsky BS, Colburn WJ, et al. A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer. 1996; 77:2267–2274. PMID: 8635094.
Article
7. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Groshen S, Waisman JR, Lewinsky BS, Martino S, et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340:1455–1461. PMID: 10320383.
Article
8. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD. Choosing treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: fine tuning the University of Southern California/Van Nuys Prognostic Index. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010; 2010:193–196. PMID: 20956828.
Article
9. Muggerud AA, Hallett M, Johnsen H, Kleivi K, Zhou W, Tahmasebpoor S, et al. Molecular diversity in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and early invasive breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 2010; 4:357–368. PMID: 20663721.
Article
10. Solin LJ, Gray R, Baehner FL, Butler SM, Hughes LL, Yoshizawa C, et al. A multigene expression assay to predict local recurrence risk for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013; 105:701–710. PMID: 23641039.
Article
11. Febbo PG, Ladanyi M, Aldape KD, De Marzo AM, Hammond ME, Hayes DF, et al. NCCN Task Force report: evaluating the clinical utility of tumor markers in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011; 9(Suppl 5):S1–S32.
Article
12. Alvarado M, Carter DL, Guenther JM, Hagans J, Lei RY, Leonard CE, et al. The impact of genomic testing on the recommendation for radiation therapy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective clinical utility assessment of the 12-gene DCIS score™ result. J Surg Oncol. 2015; 111:935–940. PMID: 26031501.
Article
13. Benson JR, Wishart GC. Predictors of recurrence for ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14:e348–e357. PMID: 23896274.
Article
14. Provenzano E, Hopper JL, Giles GG, Marr G, Venter DJ, Armes JE. Biological markers that predict clinical recurrence in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Eur J Cancer. 2003; 39:622–630. PMID: 12628841.
Article
15. Ringberg A, Anagnostaki L, Anderson H, Idvall I, Fernö M. South Sweden Breast Cancer Group. Cell biological factors in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast-relationship to ipsilateral local recurrence and histopathological characteristics. Eur J Cancer. 2001; 37:1514–1522. PMID: 11506959.
Article
16. Cornfield DB, Palazzo JP, Schwartz GF, Goonewardene SA, Kovatich AJ, Chervoneva I, et al. The prognostic significance of multiple morphologic features and biologic markers in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a study of a large cohort of patients treated with surgery alone. Cancer. 2004; 100:2317–2327. PMID: 15160334.
17. Deyarmin B, Kane JL, Valente AL, van Laar R, Gallagher C, Shriver CD, et al. Effect of ASCO/CAP guidelines for determining ER status on molecular subtype. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20:87–93. PMID: 22875649.
Article
18. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31:3997–4013. PMID: 24101045.
Article
19. Fisher ER, Dignam J, Tan-Chiu E, Costantino J, Fisher B, Paik S, et al. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) eight-year update of Protocol B-17: intraductal carcinoma. Cancer. 1999; 86:429–438. PMID: 10430251.
20. Wapnir IL, Dignam JJ, Fisher B, Mamounas EP, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011; 103:478–488. PMID: 21398619.
Article
21. Douglas-Jones AG, Logan J, Morgan JM, Johnson R, Williams R. Effect of margins of excision on recurrence after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Clin Pathol. 2002; 55:581–586. PMID: 12147650.
Article
22. McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, et al. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012; 307:467–475. PMID: 22298678.
Article
23. Hughes LL, Wang M, Page DL, Gray R, Solin LJ, Davidson NE, et al. Local excision alone without irradiation for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27:5319–5324. PMID: 19826126.
Article
24. Williams KE, Barnes NL, Cramer A, Johnson R, Cheema K, Morris J, et al. Molecular phenotypes of DCIS predict overall and invasive recurrence. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26:1019–1025. PMID: 25678586.
Article
25. Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol. 2000; 182:311–322. PMID: 10653597.
Article
26. Wang SY, Shamliyan T, Virnig BA, Kane R. Tumor characteristics as predictors of local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011; 127:1–14. PMID: 21327465.
Article
27. Zhang X, Dai H, Liu B, Song F, Chen K. Predictors for local invasive recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2016; 25:19–28. PMID: 25714649.
28. Sharaf Aldeen B, Feng J, Wu Y, Nassar Warzecha H. Molecular subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ in African American and Caucasian American women: distribution and correlation with pathological features and outcome. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013; 37:474–478. PMID: 23639792.
Article
29. Sari E, Guler G, Hayran M, Gullu I, Altundag K, Ozisik Y. Comparative study of the immunohistochemical detection of hormone receptor status and HER-2 expression in primary and paired recurrent/metastatic lesions of patients with breast cancer. Med Oncol. 2011; 28:57–63. PMID: 20099049.
Article
30. Tolles J, Bai Y, Baquero M, Harris LN, Rimm DL, Molinaro AM. Optimal tumor sampling for immunostaining of biomarkers in breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res. 2011; 13:R51. PMID: 21592345.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr