J Breast Cancer.  2015 Mar;18(1):57-62. 10.4048/jbc.2015.18.1.57.

A Dosimetric Comparative Analysis of TomoDirect and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in Early Breast Cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. koppul@catholic.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study is to compare dosimetric parameters of intensity-modulated mode of TomoDirect and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in patients with early breast cancer.
METHODS
TomoDirect and 3D-CRT planning were carried out for 26 patients with early breast cancer who had received breast-conserving surgery. A total of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions were prescribed to the planning target volume. The organs at risk (OAR) such as lung and heart were contoured. Planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage, radiation conformity index (RCI), radical dose homogeneity index (rDHI), and irradiation dose of organs at risk were compared between TomoDirect and 3D-CRT planning.
RESULTS
The mean PTV dose (51.65+/-0.37 Gy) and V47.8 (100%) in TomoDirect were significantly higher than the mean PTV dose (50.88+/-0.65 Gy) and V47.8 (89.23%+/-0.06%) in 3D-CRT (all, p<0.001). The RCI value in TomoDirect was significantly better than that in 3D-CRT (1.00 vs. 1.13, p<0.001). However, the rDHI value in TomoDirect was not significantly better than that in 3D-CRT (0.72 vs. 0.67, p=0.056). The mean lung dose and V10, V20, V30, and V40 values of ipsilateral lung in TomoDirect were significantly lower than those in 3D-CRT (all, p<0.05). There is no significant difference in the V10, V20, V30, and V40 values of heart between TomoDirect and 3D-CRT. And the mean dose for heart in TomoDirect was marginally lower than that in 3D-CRT (1.05 Gy vs. 1.62 Gy, p=0.085). The mean dose for left anterior descending coronary artery in left breast cancer was significantly lower in TomoDirect than in 3D-CRT (7.2 Gy vs. 12.1 Gy, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
Compared to 3D-CRT, TomoDirect could result in favorable target coverage while reducing the irradiation dose of the ipsilateral lung for patients with early breast cancer.

Keyword

Breast; Neoplasms; Radiometry; Radiotherapy

MeSH Terms

Breast
Breast Neoplasms*
Coronary Vessels
Heart
Humans
Lung
Mastectomy, Segmental
Organs at Risk
Radiometry
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy, Conformal*

Figure

  • Figure 1 Dose distribution for TomoDirect plan (A) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plan (B). Red contour means the planning target volume which contains lumpectomy site with clips and normal breast tissue.

  • Figure 2 Dose-volume histogram of the planning target volume in TomoDirect and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) planning. The mean value of V47.8 was significantly higher in TomoDirect than in 3D-CRT (100% vs. 89.2%, *p<0.001). VnGy=percentage of the volume receiving radiation ≥n Gy.

  • Figure 3 Dose volume histogram of the ipsilateral lung (A) and heart (B) in TomoDirect and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) planning. The mean±SD values of V10, V20, V30, and V40 of ipsilateral lung were significantly lower in TomoDirect than in 3D-CRT. VnGy=percentage of the volume receiving radiation ≥n Gy. *p<0.05.


Reference

1. Suh M, Choi KS, Lee YY, Jun JK. Trends in cancer screening rates among Korean men and women: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2013; 45:86–94.
Article
2. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1233–1241.
Article
3. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Favourable and unfavourable effects on long-term survival of radiotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2000; 355:1757–1770.
4. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, Taylor C, Arriagada R, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011; 378:1707–1716.
Article
5. Franco P, Zeverino M, Migliaccio F, Cante D, Sciacero P, Casanova Borca V, et al. Intensity-modulated and hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost adjuvant breast radiation employing statics ports of tomotherapy (TomoDirect): a prospective phase II trial. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014; 140:167–177.
Article
6. Franco P, Zeverino M, Migliaccio F, Sciacero P, Cante D, Casanova Borca V, et al. Intensity-modulated adjuvant whole breast radiation delivered with static angle tomotherapy (TomoDirect): a prospective case series. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013; 139:1927–1936.
Article
7. Borca VC, Franco P, Catuzzo P, Migliaccio F, Zenone F, Aimonetto S, et al. Does TomoDirect 3DCRT represent a suitable option for post-operative whole breast irradiation? A hypothesis-generating pilot study. Radiat Oncol. 2012; 7:211.
Article
8. Lee H, Kim S, Suh Y, Chung M, Kang D, Choi H, et al. A prospective cohort study on postoperative radiotherapy with TomoDirect using simultaneous integrated boost technique in early breast cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2014; 9:244.
Article
9. NSABP B-39, RTOG 0413: a randomized phase III study of conventional whole breast irradiation versus partial breast irradiation for women with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2006; 4:719–721.
10. Li XA, Tai A, Arthur DW, Buchholz TA, Macdonald S, Marks LB, et al. Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: an RTOG Multi-Institutional and Multiobserver Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 73:944–951.
Article
11. Taylor CW, Nisbet A, McGale P, Goldman U, Darby SC, Hall P, et al. Cardiac doses from Swedish breast cancer radiotherapy since the 1950s. Radiother Oncol. 2009; 90:127–135.
Article
12. Knöös T, Kristensen I, Nilsson P. Volumetric and dosimetric evaluation of radiation treatment plans: radiation conformity index. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998; 42:1169–1176.
Article
13. Yoon M, Park SY, Shin D, Lee SB, Pyo HR, Kim DY, et al. A new homogeneity index based on statistical analysis of the dose-volume histogram. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2007; 8:9–17.
Article
14. Bentzen SM, Skoczylas JZ, Overgaard M, Overgaard J. Radiotherapy-related lung fibrosis enhanced by tamoxifen. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996; 88:918–922.
Article
15. Dörr W, Bertmann S, Herrmann T. Radiation induced lung reactions in breast cancer therapy: modulating factors and consequential effects. Strahlenther Onkol. 2005; 181:567–573.
Article
16. West CM, Elliott RM, Burnet NG. The genomics revolution and radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007; 19:470–480.
Article
17. Vogelius IR, Bentzen SM. A literature-based meta-analysis of clinical risk factors for development of radiation induced pneumonitis. Acta Oncol. 2012; 51:975–983.
Article
18. Movsas B, Raffin TA, Epstein AH, Link CJ Jr. Pulmonary radiation injury. Chest. 1997; 111:1061–1076.
Article
19. Harris EE, Correa C, Hwang WT, Liao J, Litt HI, Ferrari VA, et al. Late cardiac mortality and morbidity in early-stage breast cancer patients after breast-conservation treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24:4100–4106.
Article
20. Paszat LF, Mackillop WJ, Groome PA, Schulze K, Holowaty E. Mortality from myocardial infarction following postlumpectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999; 43:755–762.
Article
21. Marks LB, Yu X, Vujaskovic Z, Small W Jr, Folz R, Anscher MS. Radiation-induced lung injury. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003; 13:333–345.
Article
22. Qiu JJ, Chang Z, Horton JK, Wu QR, Yoo S, Yin FF. Dosimetric comparison of 3D conformal, IMRT, and V-MAT techniques for accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI). Med Dosim. 2014; 39:152–158.
Article
23. Herrick JS, Neill CJ, Rosser PF. A comprehensive clinical 3-dimensional dosimetric analysis of forward planned IMRT and conventional wedge planned techniques for intact breast radiotherapy. Med Dosim. 2008; 33:62–70.
Article
24. Michalski A, Atyeo J, Cox J, Rinks M, Morgia M, Lamoury G. A dosimetric comparison of 3D-CRT, IMRT, and static tomotherapy with an SIB for large and small breast volumes. Med Dosim. 2014; 39:163–168.
Article
25. Yu M, Jang HS, Jeon DM, Cheon GS, Lee HC, Chung MJ, et al. Dosimetric evaluation of Tomotherapy and four-box field conformal radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Radiat Oncol J. 2013; 31:252–259.
Article
26. Sas-Korczyńska B, Sladowska A, Rozwadowska-Bogusz B, Dyczek S, Lesiak J, Kokoszka A, et al. Comparison between intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and 3D tangential beams technique used in patients with early-stage breast cancer who received breast-conserving therapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2010; 15:79–86.
Article
27. Baycan D, Karacetin D, Balkanay AY, Barut Y. Field-in-field IMRT versus 3D-CRT of the breast. Cardiac vessels, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral breast absorbed doses in patients with left-sided lumpectomy: a dosimetric comparison. Jpn J Radiol. 2012; 30:819–823.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr