Korean J Pain.  2011 Mar;24(1):31-35. 10.3344/kjp.2011.24.1.31.

Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Block versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Block with Levobupivacaine for Circumcision in Children

Affiliations
  • 1Departmant of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Sevgi Women's and Children's Hospital, Ordu, Turkey. sgbeyaz@gmail.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Circumcision is a painful intervention frequently performed in pediatric surgery. We aim to compare the efficacy of caudal block versus dorsal penile block (DPNB) under general anesthesia for children undergoing circumcision.
METHODS
This study was performed between July 1, 2009 and October 16, 2009. Fifty male children American Society of Anesthesiolgists physical status classification I, aged between 3 and 12 were included in this randomized, prospective, comparative study. Anesthetic techniques were standardized for all children. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Using 0.25% 0.5 ml/kg levobupivacain, we performed DPNB for Group 1 and caudal block for Group 2. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated for six hours with the Flacc Pain Scale for five categories; (F) Face, (L) Legs, (A) Activity, (C) Cry, and (C) Consolability. For every child, supplemental analgesic amounts, times, and probable local or systemic complications were recorded.
RESULTS
No significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05) was found in mean age, body weight, anesthesia duration, FLACC pain, and sedation scores (P > 0.05). However, on subsequent measurements, a significant decrease of pain and sedation scores was noted in both the DPNB group and the caudal block group (P < 0.001). No major complication was found when using either technique.
CONCLUSIONS
DPNB and caudal block provided similar postoperative analgesic effects without major complications for children under general anesthesia.

Keyword

analgesic; caudal block; circumcision; dorsal penile nerve block; levobupivacaine

MeSH Terms

Aged
Analgesia
Anesthesia
Anesthesia, General
Body Weight
Bupivacaine
Child
Circumcision, Male
Female
Humans
Leg
Male
Prospective Studies
Pudendal Nerve
Bupivacaine

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Comparison of FLACC pain scores at different time intervals of Group 1 and Group 2. No significant difference was found between the groups. Group 1: DPNB group, Group 2: caudal block group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.

  • Fig. 2 Intergroup comparison of postoperative Ramsey sedation scores. Ramsey sedation scores versus time revealed that sedation scores decreased significantly over time (P < 0.001), but there was no significance difference between groups. Group 1: DPNB group, Group 2: caudal block group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.


Cited by  2 articles

Morphologic Diversities of Sacral Canal in Children; Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Study
Dae Wook Kim, Seung Jun Lee, Eun Joo Choi, Pyung Bok Lee, Young Hyun Jo, Francis Sahngun Nahm
Korean J Pain. 2014;27(3):253-259.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.3.253.

Predictive Factors of Postoperative Pain and Postoperative Anxiety in Children Undergoing Elective Circumcision: A Prospective Cohort Study
Nick Zavras, Stella Tsamoudaki, Vasileia Ntomi, Ioannis Yiannopoulos, Efstratios Christianakis, Emmanuel Pikoulis
Korean J Pain. 2015;28(4):244-253.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2015.28.4.244.


Reference

1. Choi WY, Irwin MG, Hui TW, Lim HH, Chan KL. EMLA cream versus dorsal penile nerve block for postcircumcision analgesia in children. Anesth Analg. 2003; 96:396–399. PMID: 12538184.
Article
2. Serour F, Cohen A, Mandelberg A, Mori J, Ezra S. Dorsal penile nerve block in children undergoing circumcision in a day-care surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1996; 43:954–958. PMID: 8874914.
Article
3. Telgarsky B, Karovic D, Wassermann O, Ogibovicova E, Csomor D, Koppl J, et al. Penile block in children, our first experience. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2006; 107:320–322. PMID: 17125067.
4. Ivani G, Mosseti V. Pediatric regional anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009; 75:577–583. PMID: 19798014.
5. Silvani P, Camporesi A, Agostino MR, Salvo I. Caudal anesthesia in pediatrics: an update. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006; 72:453–459. PMID: 16682915.
6. Brady-Fryer B, Wiebe N, Lander JA. Pain relief for neonatal circumcision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; CD004217. PMID: 15495086.
Article
7. De Negri P, Ivani G, Tirri T, Favullo L, Nardelli A. New drugs, new techniques, new indications in pediatric regional anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2002; 68:420–427. PMID: 12029257.
8. Cyna AM, Middleton P. Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; CD003005. PMID: 18843636.
Article
9. Uguralp S, Mutus M, Koroglu A, Gurbuz N, Koltuksuz U, Demircan M. Regional anesthesia is a good alternative to general anesthesia in pediatric surgery: Experience in 1,554 children. J Pediatr Surg. 2002; 37:610–613. PMID: 11912520.
Article
10. Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, Tait AR, Merkel S, Foster R, Krane EJ, et al. A comparison of the clinical utility of pain assessment tools for children with cognitive impairment. Anesth Analg. 2008; 106:72–78. PMID: 18165556.
Article
11. Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J. 1974; 2:656–659. PMID: 4835444.
Article
12. Humphries Y, Melson M, Gore D. Superiority of oral ketamine as an analgesic and sedative for wound care procedures in the pediatric patient with burns. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1997; 18:34–36. PMID: 9063785.
Article
13. Metzelder ML, Kuebler JF, Glueer S, Suempelmann R, Ure BM, Petersen C. Penile block is associated with less urinary retention than caudal anesthesia in distal hypospadia repair in children. World J Urol. 2010; 28:87–91. PMID: 19466428.
Article
14. Sanford M, Keating GM. Levobupivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and pain management. Drugs. 2010; 70:761–791. PMID: 20394458.
15. Frawley GP, Downie S, Huang GH. Levobupivacaine caudal anesthesia in children: a randomized double-blind comparison with bupivacaine. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006; 16:754–760. PMID: 16879518.
Article
16. Weksler N, Atias I, Klein M, Rosenztsveig V, Ovadia L, Gurman GM. Is penile block better than caudal epidural block for postcircumcision analgesia? J Anesth. 2005; 19:36–39. PMID: 15674514.
Article
17. Stolik-Dollberg OC, Dollberg S. Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision. BMC Pediatr. 2005; 5:12. PMID: 15907216.
Article
18. Margetts L, Carr A, McFadyen G, Lambert A. A comparison of caudal bupivacaine and ketamine with penile block for paediatric circumcision. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008; 25:1009–1013. PMID: 18652709.
Article
19. Sandeman DJ, Reiner D, Dilley AV, Bennett MH, Kelly KJ. A retrospective audit of three different regional anaesthetic techniques for circumcision in children. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010; 38:519–524. PMID: 20514962.
Article
20. Faraoni D, Gilbeau A, Lingier P, Barvais L, Engelman E, Hennart D. Does ultrasound guidance improve the efficacy of dorsal penile nerve block in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 2010; 20:931–936. PMID: 20849498.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr