Ann Rehabil Med.  2015 Oct;39(5):778-785. 10.5535/arm.2015.39.5.778.

Improved Dysphagia After Decannulation of Tracheostomy in Patients With Brain Injuries

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Myongji Hospital, Seonam University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea. saintc@naver.com

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To investigate improved dysphagia after the decannulation of a tracheostomy in patients with brain injuries.
METHODS
The subjects of this study are patients with brain injuries who were admitted to the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine in Myongji Hospital and who underwent a decannulation between 2012 and 2014. A video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) was performed in order to investigate whether the patients' dysphagia had improved. We measured the following 5 parameters: laryngeal elevation, pharyngeal transit time, post-swallow pharyngeal remnant, upper esophageal width, and semisolid aspiration. We analyzed the patients' results from VFSS performed one month before and one month after decannulation. All VFSS images were recorded using a camcorder running at 30 frames per second. An AutoCAD 2D screen was used to measure laryngeal elevation, post-swallow pharyngeal remnant, and upper esophageal width.
RESULTS
In this study, a number of dysphagia symptoms improved after decannulation. Laryngeal elevation, pharyngeal transit time, and semisolid aspiration showed no statistically significant differences (p>0.05), however after decannulation, the post-swallow pharyngeal remnant (pre 37.41%+/-24.80%, post 21.02%+/-11.75%; p<0.001) and upper esophageal width (pre 3.57+/-1.93 mm, post 4.53+/-2.05 mm; p<0.001) showed statistically significant differences.
CONCLUSION
When decannulation is performed on patients with brain injuries who do not require a ventilator and who are able to independently excrete sputum, improved esophageal dysphagia can be expected.

Keyword

Fluoroscopy; Tracheostomy; Dysphagia; Brain injuries; Upper esophageal sphincter

MeSH Terms

Brain Injuries*
Brain*
Deglutition
Deglutition Disorders*
Esophageal Sphincter, Upper
Fluoroscopy
Humans
Rehabilitation
Running
Sputum
Tracheostomy*
Ventilators, Mechanical

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Laryngeal elevation. The zero point is defined as the anterior-inferior margin of the fourth cervical vertebral body, with the y-axis as the straight line that connects the zero point with the anterior-inferior margin of the second cervical vertebral body and the x-axis as the line perpendicular to the y-axis. The hyoid bone shown in its position in the resting state (A) and at the most highly raised position during swallowing (B).

  • Fig. 2 Post-swallow pharyngeal remnant. The difference in the remnant (%) was measured before and after swallowing using the AutoCAD 2D screen. (A) Remnant before swallowing and (B) remnant after swallowing.

  • Fig. 3 Upper esophageal width. Corresponds to the anteroposterior diameter (mm) of the narrowest region of C3-6 during maximum opening using the AutoCAD 2D screen. (A) Resting state and (B) swallowing state.

  • Fig. 4 Method of sealing the offsite dressing. The comma (arrow) indicates the seal off site. Pressing the area of dressing site prevents air leakage into the seal off site in case of a cough.


Cited by  2 articles

Effect of Vallecular Ballooning in Stroke Patients With Dysphagia
Yong Kyun Kim, Sang-heon Lee, Jang-won Lee
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(2):231-238.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.2.231.

Effects of Capping of the Tracheostomy Tube in Stroke Patients With Dysphagia
Yong kyun Kim, Sang-heon Lee, Jang-won Lee
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(3):426-433.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.426.


Reference

1. Stelfox HT, Crimi C, Berra L, Noto A, Schmidt U, Bigatello LM, et al. Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey. Crit Care. 2008; 12:R26. PMID: 18302759.
Article
2. Frutos-Vivar F, Esteban A, Apezteguia C, Anzueto A, Nightingale P, Gonzalez M, et al. Outcome of mechanically ventilated patients who require a tracheostomy. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33:290–298. PMID: 15699830.
Article
3. Kollef MH, Ahrens TS, Shannon W. Clinical predictors and outcomes for patients requiring tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1999; 27:1714–1720. PMID: 10507588.
Article
4. Fischler L, Erhart S, Kleger GR, Frutiger A. Prevalence of tracheostomy in ICU patients. A nation-wide survey in Switzerland. Intensive Care Med. 2000; 26:1428–1433. PMID: 11126252.
Article
5. Bosel J. Tracheostomy in stroke patients. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2014; 16:274. PMID: 24357462.
Article
6. Goldenberg D, Ari EG, Golz A, Danino J, Netzer A, Joachims HZ. Tracheotomy complications: a retrospective study of 1130 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 123:495–500. PMID: 11020193.
Article
7. Epstein SK. Late complications of tracheostomy. Respir Care. 2005; 50:542–549. PMID: 15807919.
8. Norwood S, Vallina VL, Short K, Saigusa M, Fernandez LG, McLarty JW. Incidence of tracheal stenosis and other late complications after percutaneous tracheostomy. Ann Surg. 2000; 232:233–241. PMID: 10903603.
Article
9. Ceriana P, Carlucci A, Schreiber A, Fracchia C, Cazzani C, Dichiarante M, et al. Changes of swallowing function after tracheostomy: a videofluoroscopy study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015; 81:389–397. PMID: 25220547.
10. Braddom RL. Physical medicine and rehabilitation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders;2011. p. 579–597.
11. Garuti G, Reverberi C, Briganti A, Massobrio M, Lombardi F, Lusuardi M. Swallowing disorders in tracheostomised patients: a multidisciplinary/multiprofessional approach in decannulation protocols. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2014; 9:36. PMID: 25006457.
Article
12. Wise SP, Murray EA, Gerfen CR. The frontal cortexbasal ganglia system in primates. Crit Rev Neurobiol. 1996; 10:317–356. PMID: 8978985.
Article
13. Nam HS, Beom J, Oh BM, Han TR. Kinematic effects of hyolaryngeal electrical stimulation therapy on hyoid excursion and laryngeal elevation. Dysphagia. 2013; 28:548–556. PMID: 23605128.
Article
14. Kim JC, Kim JS, Jung JH, Kim YK. The effect of balloon dilatation through video-fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) in stroke patients with cricopharyngeal dysfunction. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2011; 35:23–26.
15. Wada S, Tohara H, Iida T, Inoue M, Sato M, Ueda K. Jaw-opening exercise for insufficient opening of upper esophageal sphincter. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93:1995–1999. PMID: 22579648.
Article
16. Kang JY, Choi KH, Yun GJ, Kim MY, Ryu JS. Does removal of tracheostomy affect dysphagia? A kinematic analysis. Dysphagia. 2012; 27:498–503. PMID: 22327860.
Article
17. Drulia TC, Ludlow CL. Relative efficacy of swallowing versus non-swallowing tasks in dysphagia rehabilitation: current evidence and future directions. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2013; 1:242–256. PMID: 24470988.
Article
18. Gross RD, Mahlmann J, Grayhack JP. Physiologic effects of open and closed tracheostomy tubes on the pharyngeal swallow. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003; 112:143–152. PMID: 12597287.
Article
19. Gross RD, Steinhauer KM, Zajac DJ, Weissler MC. Direct measurement of subglottic air pressure while swallowing. Laryngoscope. 2006; 116:753–761. PMID: 16652083.
Article
20. Gross RD, Mahlmann J, Grayhack JP. Physiologic effects of open and closed tracheostomy tubes on the pharyngeal swallow. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003; 112:143–152. PMID: 12597287.
Article
21. Eibling DE, Gross RD. Subglottic air pressure: a key component of swallowing efficiency. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996; 105:253–258. PMID: 8604883.
Article
22. Terk AR, Leder SB, Burrell MI. Hyoid bone and laryngeal movement dependent upon presence of a tracheotomy tube. Dysphagia. 2007; 22:89–93. PMID: 17287926.
Article
23. Feldman SA, Deal CW, Urquhart W. Disturbance of swallowing after tracheostomy. Lancet. 1966; 1:954–955. PMID: 4160518.
Article
24. Donzelli J, Brady S, Wesling M, Theisen M. Effects of the removal of the tracheotomy tube on swallowing during the fiberoptic endoscopic exam of the swallow (FEES). Dysphagia. 2005; 20:283–289. PMID: 16633873.
Article
25. Leder SB, Ross DA. Confirmation of no causal relationship between tracheotomy and aspiration status: a direct replication study. Dysphagia. 2010; 25:35–39. PMID: 19653040.
Article
26. Adams V, Mathisen B, Baines S, Lazarus C, Callister R. Reliability of measurements of tongue and hand strength and endurance using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument with elderly adults. Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37:389–395. PMID: 24854105.
Article
27. Ertekin C, Aydogdu I. Electromyography of human cricopharyngeal muscle of the upper esophageal sphincter. Muscle Nerve. 2002; 26:729–739. PMID: 12451598.
Article
28. Cook IJ, Dodds WJ, Dantas RO, Massey B, Kern MK, Lang IM, et al. Opening mechanisms of the human upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Physiol. 1989; 257(5 Pt 1):G748–G759. PMID: 2596608.
Article
29. Kuhn MA, Belafsky PC. Management of cricopharyngeus muscle dysfunction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013; 46:1087–1099. PMID: 24262961.
Article
30. Rehman HU, Knox J. There is a need for a regular review of swallowing ability in patients after PEG insertion to identify patients with delayed recovery of swallowing. Dysphagia. 2000; 15:48. PMID: 10594259.
Article
31. Hull MA, Rawlings J, Murray FE, Field J, McIntyre AS, Mahida YR, et al. Audit of outcome of long-term enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Lancet. 1993; 341:869–872. PMID: 8096573.
Article
32. Singh S, Hamdy S. Dysphagia in stroke patients. Postgrad Med J. 2006; 82:383–391. PMID: 16754707.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr