J Korean Med Sci.  2009 Dec;24(6):1182-1186. 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.6.1182.

Long-Term Results of Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.
  • 2Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ksleedr@skku.edu

Abstract

We evaluated the long-term efficacy of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. A total of 68 patients who underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic Burch colposuspensions with more than a 3-yr follow-up were included. The colposuspension was performed by using two non-absorbable sutures on each side. The patients were considered to be cured of SUI if they had a negative result of cough stress test and there were no reports of urine leakage during physical stress. The mean follow-up period was 52 months (range, 36 to 83 months). The overall subjective cure rate was reported in 49 patients (72%). There was no significant difference between the cured and non-cured group in terms of clinical parameters. The cure rate tended to decline gradually over time and it was more deteriorated significantly after 4 yr of surgery. Based on these results, we recommend that long-term follow-up is needed when evaluating the clinical efficacy of anti-incontinence surgery.

Keyword

Urinary Incontinence, Stress; Laparoscopy; Follow-Up Studies

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy/*methods
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Incontinence, Stress/*surgery

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Estimates of the cumulative continence proportion for 68 patients who underwent laparoscopic Burch colposuspensions according to the surgical experience.


Reference

1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002. 21:167–178.
Article
2. McDougall EM. Laparoscopic management of female urinary incontinence. Urol Clin North Am. 2001. 28:145–149.
Article
3. Burch JC. Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper's ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele, and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961. 81:281–290.
Article
4. Alcalay M, Monga A, Stanton SL. Burch colposuspension: a 10-20 year follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995. 102:740–745.
Article
5. Drouin J, Tessier J, Bertrand PE, Schick E. Burch colposuspension: long-term results and review of published reports. Urology. 1999. 54:808–814.
Article
6. Vancaillie TG, Schuessler W. Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991. 1:169–173.
7. Buller JL, Cundiff GW. Laparoscopic surgeries for urinary incontinence. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000. 43:604–618.
Article
8. Stothers L. Reliability, validity, and gender differences in the quality of life index of the SEAPI-QMM incontinence classification system. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004. 23:223–228.
Article
9. Blaivas JG, Olsson CA. Stress incontinence: classification and surgical approach. J Urol. 1988. 139:727–731.
Article
10. Tanagho EA. Colpocystourethropexy: the way we do it. J Urol. 1976. 116:751–753.
Article
11. Lapitan MC, Cody DJ, Grant AM. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. CD002912.
Article
12. Liu CY, Paek W. Laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension (Burch procedure). J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1993. 1:31–35.
Article
13. Dean NM, Ellis G, Wilson PD, Herbison GP. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. 3:CD002239.
Article
14. Persson J, Wolner-Hanssen P. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence: a randomized comparison of one or two sutures on each side of the urethra. Obstet Gynecol. 2000. 95:151–155.
Article
15. el-Toukhy TA, Davies AE. The efficacy of laparoscopic mesh colposuspension: results of a prospective controlled study. BJU Int. 2001. 88:361–366.
Article
16. Zullo F, Palomba S, Russo T, Sbano FM, Falbo A, Morelli M, Pellicano M, Mastrantonio P. Laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures or prolene meshes: a 3-year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004. 117:201–203.
Article
17. Ross J. Two techniques of laparoscopic Burch repair for stress incontinence: a prospective, randomized study. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996. 3:351–357.
Article
18. Carey MP, Goh JT, Rosamilia A, Cornish A, Gordon I, Hawthorne G, Maher CF, Dwyer PL, Moran P, Gilmour DT. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2006. 113:999–1006.
Article
19. Kitchener HC, Dunn G, Lawton V, Reid F, Nelson L, Smith AR. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension--results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2006. 113:1007–1013.
Article
20. Sirls LT, Keoleian CM, Korman HJ, Kirkemo AK. The effect of study methodology on reported success rates of the modified Pereyra bladder neck suspension. J Urol. 1995. 154:1732–1735.
Article
21. Jenkins TR, Liu CY. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007. 19:314–318.
Article
22. De Cuyper EM, Ismail R, Maher CF. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension after failed sub-urethral tape procedures: a retrospective audit. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008. 19:681–685.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr