J Korean Med Sci.  2009 Aug;24(4):690-694. 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.690.

Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Using Swiss Lithoclast for Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: 12-Years Experience

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Bundang CHA Hospital, Pochon CHA University, College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea. urohong@yahoo.co.kr

Abstract

Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using Swiss Lithoclast was performed in 411 cases from January 1996 to September 2007 in a single hospital. Medical records of 341 cases, in which Swiss Lithoclast was successfully applied, were available for this retrospective study. We used 9.5Fr and 10Fr Storz rigid ureteroscopes. A success was defined as being free of stone-related symptoms and residual stones larger than 2 mm. Sixty one stones were located in the upper ureter, 49 stones were in the mid ureter, and 231 stones were in the lower ureter. The overall success rate was 93.5%. The success rate of upper ureter stone (80.3%) was significantly lower compared with those of mid (93.8%) and lower (96.9%) ureter stones (P=0.001). The higher the calculi was located within the ureter, the more chance of upward migration there was (P<0.001). The success rate in male patients was lower than in female patients without a statistical significance (P=0.068). The success rate decreased as the size of the stone increased (P<0.001), and as the degree of hydronephrosis increased (P=0.03). Perforation rates were 4.9%, 4.1%, and 2.6% from upper to lower ureter stone group. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using Swiss Lithoclast is a safe and useful treatment modality for ureteral calculi.

Keyword

Ureter; Calculi; Lithotripsy

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Humans
*Lithotripsy
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Ureteral Calculi/complications/*therapy
Ureteroscopy

Reference

1. Mugiya S, Nagata M, Un-No T, Takayama T, Suzuki K, Fujita K. Endoscopic management of impacted ureteral stones using a small caliber ureteroscope and a laser lithotriptor. J Urol. 2000. 164:329–331.
Article
2. Dubosq F, Pasqui F, Girard F, Beley S, Lesaux N, Gattegno B, Thibault P, Traxer O. Endoscopic lithotripsy and the FREDDY laser: initial experience. J Endourol. 2006. 20:296–299.
Article
3. Marks AJ, Teichman JM. Lasers in clinical urology: state of the art and new horizons. World J Urol. 2007. 25:227–233.
Article
4. Piergiovanni M, Desgrandchamps F, Cochand-Priollet B, Janssen T, Colomer S, Teillac P, Le Duc A. Ureteral and bladder lesions after ballistic, ultrasonic, electrohydraulic, or laser lithotripsy. J Endourol. 1994. 8:293–299.
Article
5. Denstedt JD. Smith A, Badlani GH, Bagley DH, editors. Intracorporeal lithotriptors. Smith's Textbook of Endourology. 1996. St. Louis, Mo: Quality Medical Publishing;47–63.
6. Willscher MK, Conway JF Jr, Babayan RK, Morrisseau P, Sant GR, Bertagnoll A. Safety and efficacy of electrohydraulic lithotripsy by ureteroscopy. J Urol. 1988. 140:957–958.
Article
7. Denstedt JD, Clayman RV. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1990. 143:13–17.
Article
8. Biri H, Küpeli B, Isen K, Sinik Z, Karaoğlan U, Bozkirli I. Treatment of lower ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or intracorporeal lithotripsy? J Endourol. 1999. 13:77–81.
9. Hofbauer J, Höbarth K, Marberger M. Electrohydraulic versus pneumatic disintegration in the treatment of ureteral stones: a randomized, prospective trial. J Urol. 1995. 153:623–625.
Article
10. Kurahashi T, Miyake H, Oka N, Shinozaki M, Takenaka A, Hara I, Fujisawa M. Clinical outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for 2,129 patients with ureteral stones. Urol Res. 2007. 35:149–153.
Article
11. Teichman JM. The use of holmium:YAG laser in urology. AUA Update Series. 2001. 20:154–158.
12. Denstedt JD, Eberwein PM, Singh RR. The Swiss Lithoclast: a new device for intracorporeal lithotripsy. J Urol. 1992. 148:1088–1090.
Article
13. Teh CL, Zhong P, Preminger GM. Laboratory and clinical assessment of pneumatically driven intracorporeal lithotripsy. J Endourol. 1998. 12:163–169.
14. Jeon SS, Hyun JH, Lee KS. A comparison of holmium:YAG laser with Lithoclast lithotripsy in ureteral calculi fragmentation. Int J Urol. 2005. 12:544–547.
Article
15. Tipu SA, Malik HA, Mohhayuddin N, Sultan G, Hussain M, Hashmi A, Naqvi SA, Rizvi SA. Treatment of ureteric calculi--use of Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy versus pneumatic lithoclast. J Pak Med Assoc. 2007. 57:440–443.
16. Bapat SS, Pai KV, Purnapatre SS, Yadav PB, Padye AS. Comparison of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in managing upperureteral stones. J Endourol. 2007. 21:1425–1427.
Article
17. Sözen S, Küpeli B, Tunc L, Senocak C, Alkibay T, Karaoğlan U, Bozkirli I. Management of ureteral stones with pneumatic lithotripsy: report of 500 patients. J Endourol. 2003. 17:721–724.
Article
18. Yinghao S, Linhui W, Songxi Q, Guoqiang L, Chuanliang X, Xu G, Yongjiang M. Treatment of urinary calculi with ureteroscopy and Swiss lithoclast pneumatic lithotripter: report of 150 cases. J Endourol. 2000. 14:281–283.
Article
19. Tan PK, Tan SM, Consigliere D. Ureteroscopic lithoclast lithotripsy: a cost-effective option. J Endourol. 1998. 12:341–344.
20. Dirim A, Tekin MI, Aytekin C, Peskircioglu L, Boyvat F, Ozkardes H. Ureteroscopic treatment of proximal ureter stones with the aid of an antegrade occlusion balloon catheter. Acta Radiol. 2006. 47:103–106.
Article
21. Maislos SD, Volpe M, Albert PS, Raboy A. Efficacy of the stone cone for treatment of proximal ureteral stones. J Endourol. 2004. 18:862–864.
Article
22. Mohseni MG, Arasteh S, Alizadeh F. Preventing retrograde stone displacement during pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi using lidocaine jelly. Urology. 2006. 68:505–507.
Article
23. Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ, Wolf JS Jr. Complications of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors. J Urol. 2001. 166:538–540.
Article
24. Harmon WJ, Sershon PD, Blute ML, Patterson DE, Segura JW. Ureteroscopy: current practice and long-term complications. J Urol. 1997. 157:28–32.
Article
25. Hosking DH, McColm SE, Smith WE. Is stenting following ureteroscopy for removal of distal ureteral calculi necessary? J Urol. 1999. 161:48–50.
Article
26. Rane A, Cahill D, Larner T, Saleemi A, Tiptaft R. To stent or not to stent? That is still the question? J Endourol. 2000. 14:479–481.
Article
27. Denstedt JD, Wollin TA, Sofer M, Nott L, Weir M, D'A Honey RJ. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nonstented versus stented ureteroscopic lithotripsy. J Urol. 2001. 165:1419–1422.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr