J Korean Med Sci.  2009 Jan;24(Suppl 1):S143-S147. 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.S1.S143.

Kidney Transplantation in Sensitized Recipients; A Single Center Experience

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. yonsukim@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Transplant Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

A successful transplantation, across a positive crossmatch barrier, is one of the most persistent long- standing problems in the field of kidney transplant medicine. The aim of this study was to describe seven consecutive living renal transplantations in recipients with positive crossmatch for donors or positive for donor specific antibodies (DSAs). A preconditioning regimen including plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin was delivered three times a week until the crossmatch and/ or DSAs became negative. Mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus were started two days before the plasmapheresis. The protocol was modified to include administration of anti-CD 20 antibody (rituximab, 375 mg/m(2)) from the patient number 3 through the patient number 7. All seven patients achieved negative conversion of the crossmatch or DSAs, and the kidney transplantations were successfully performed in all cases. Acute cellular rejection occurred in two patients, which were subclinical and controlled with high dose steroid treatment. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in one patient, which was easily reversed with plasmapheresis. All recipients attained normal graft function during the 7-24 months of follow up. Our study suggests that sensitized patients can be transplanted successfully with desensitization pretreatment.

Keyword

Desensitization, Immunologic; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Kidney Transplantation; Plasmapheresis; Rituximab

MeSH Terms

Adult
Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology
Antigens, CD20/biosynthesis
Biopsy
Female
Graft Rejection
Graft Survival
Histocompatibility Testing/methods
Humans
Immunoglobulins/chemistry
Kidney Transplantation/*methods
Male
Middle Aged
Plasmapheresis
Transplantation Conditioning

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Desensitization protocol. Anti-CD 20 Ab, anti-CD 20 antibody; PP, plasmapheresis; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; DSA, donor specific antibody; OP, operation.


Cited by  1 articles

Cardiovascular Diseases after Kidney Transplantation in Korea
Jong Cheol Jeong, Han Ro, Young-Hwan Hwang, Han Kyu Lee, Jongwon Ha, Curie Ahn, Jaeseok Yang
J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25(11):1589-1594.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.11.1589.


Reference

1. Korean Network for Organ Sharing. 2006 Annual Report: Transplant Data 2000-2006. Available from: URL: http://www.konos.go.kr.
2. de Klerk M, Witvliet MD, Haase-Kromwijk BJ, Claas FH, Weimar W. A highly efficient living donor kidney exchange program for both blood type and crossmatch incompatible donor-recipient combinations. Transplantation. 2006. 82:1616–1620.
Article
3. Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, Port FK, Wynn JJ, Merion RM. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2003. 3:Suppl 4. 114–125.
Article
4. Rydberg L. ABO-incompatibility in solid organ transplantation. Transfus Med. 2001. 11:325–342.
Article
5. Warren DS, Zachary AA, Sonnenday CJ, King KE, Cooper M, Ratner LE, Shirey RS, Haas M, Leffell MS, Montgomery RA. Successful renal transplantation across simultaneous ABO incompatible and positive crossmatch barriers. Am J Transplant. 2004. 4:561–568.
Article
6. Kim BS, Kim YS, Kim SI, Kim MS, Lee HY, Kim YL, Kim CD, Yang CW, Choi BS, Han DJ, Kim YS, Kim SJ, Oh HY, Kim DJ. Outcome of multipair donor kidney exchange by a web-based algorithm. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007. 18:1000–1006.
Article
7. Kuehn BM. Kidney donor exchange program planned. JAMA. 2005. 293:1716.
Article
8. U. S. Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Annual Report 2004: Transplant Data 1994-2003. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation, Rockville, MD; United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA; University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MI.
9. Patel R, Terasaki PI. Significance of the positive crossmatch test in kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1969. 280:735–739.
Article
10. Schweitzer EJ, Wilson JS, Fernandez-Vina M, Fox M, Gutierrez M, Wiland A, Hunter J, Farney A, Philosophe B, Colonna J, Jarrell BE, Bartlett ST. A high panel-reactive antibody rescue protocol for crossmatch-positive live donor kidney transplants. Transplantation. 2000. 70:1531–1536.
11. Gloor JM, DeGoey SR, Pineda AA, Moore SB, Prieto M, Nyberg SL, Larson TS, Griffin MD, Textor SC, Velosa JA, Schwab TR, Fix LA, Stegall MD. Overcoming a positive crossmatch in living-donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2003. 3:1017–1023.
Article
12. Montgomery RA, Zachary AA. Transplanting patients with a positive donor-specific crossmatch: a single center's perspective. Pediatr Transplant. 2004. 8:535–542.
Article
13. Stegall MD, Gloor J, Winters JL, Moore SB, Degoey S. A comparison of plasmapheresis versus high-dose IVIG desensitization in renal allograft recipients with high levels of donor specific alloantibody. Am J Transplant. 2006. 6:346–351.
Article
14. Gebel HM, Bray RA. Sensitization and sensitivity: defining the unsensitized patient. Transplantation. 2000. 69:1370–1374.
15. Karpinski M, Rush D, Jeffery J, Exner M, Regele H, Dancea S, Pochinco D, Birk P, Nickerson P. Flow cytometric crossmatching in primary renal transplant recipients with a negative anti-human globulin enhanced cytotoxicity crossmatch. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001. 12:2807–2814.
Article
16. Piazza A, Poggi E, Borrelli L, Servetti S, Monaco PI, Buonomo O, Valeri M, Torlone N, Adorno D, Casciani CU. Impact of donor-specific antibodies on chronic rejection occurrence and graft loss in renal transplantation: posttransplant analysis using flow cytometric techniques. Transplantation. 2001. 71:1106–1112.
17. Rebibou JM, Bittencourt MC, Saint-Hillier Y, Chabod J, Dupont I, Bittard H, Chalopin JM, Herve P, Tiberghien P. T-cell flow-cytometry crossmatch and long-term renal graft survival. Clin Transplant. 2004. 18:558–563.
Article
18. Kerman R, Lappin J, Kahan B, Katz S, McKissick E, Hosek K, Acorda N, Wooley N, Hoover A, Miller K, Rodriguez L, Moore B, Melcher P, Biedermann B, Van Buren C. The crossmatch may still be the most clinically relevant histocompatibility test performed. Clin Transpl. 2007. 227–229.
19. Gupta A, Iveson V, Varagunam M, Bodger S, Sinnott P, Thuraisingham RC. Pretransplant donor-specific antibodies in cytotoxic negative crossmatch kidney transplants: are they relevant? Transplantation. 2008. 85:1200–1204.
Article
20. Matignon M, Tagnaouti M, Audard V, Dahan K, Lang P, Grimbert P. Failure of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy to prevent antibody-mediated rejection in three crossmatch-positive renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2007. 39:2565–2567.
Article
21. Montgomery RA, Zachary AA, Racusen LC, Leffell MS, King KE, Burdick J, Maley WR, Ratner LE. Plasmapheresis and intravenous immune globulin provides effective rescue therapy for refractory humoral rejection and allows kidneys to be successfully transplanted into cross-match-positive recipients. Transplantation. 2000. 70:887–895.
Article
22. Bearden CM, Agarwal A, Book BK, Sidner RA, Gebel HM, Bray RA, Pescovitz MD. Pronase treatment facilitates alloantibody flow cytometric and cytotoxic crossmatching in the presence of rituximab. Hum Immunol. 2004. 65:803–809.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr