1. Fanelli GC, Edson CJ. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in trauma patients: part II. Arthroscopy. 1995. 11(5):526–529.
Article
2. Shelbourne KD, Davis TJ, Patel DV. The natural history of acute, isolated, nonoperatively treated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1999. 27(3):276–283.
Article
3. Boynton MD, Tietjens BR. Long-term followup of the untreated isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med. 1996. 24(3):306–310.
Article
4. Clancy WG Jr, Shelbourne KD, Zoellner GB, Keene JS, Reider B, Rosenberg TD. Treatment of knee joint instability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament: report of a new procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983. 65(3):310–322.
Article
5. Keller PM, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, Rettig AC. Non-operatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1993. 21(1):132–136.
Article
6. MacGillivray JD, Stein BE, Park M, Allen AA, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2006. 22(3):320–328.
Article
7. Seon JK, Song EK. Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques. Arthroscopy. 2006. 22(1):27–32.
Article
8. Berg EE. Posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1995. 11(1):69–76.
Article
9. Bergfeld JA, McAllister DR, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE. A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2001. 29(2):129–136.
Article
10. Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, McAllister DR. Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002. 84(4):518–524.
Article
11. Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Kanamori A, Yagi M, Vogrin TM, Woo SL. Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2000. 28(2):144–151.
Article
12. Race A, Amis AA. The mechanical properties of the two bundles of the human posterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech. 1994. 27(1):13–24.
Article
13. Shearn JT, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Levy MS. Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how bundle tension depends on femoral placement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004. 86(6):1262–1270.
Article
14. Fanelli GC, Giannotti BF, Edson CJ. The posterior cruciate ligament arthroscopic evaluation and treatment. Arthroscopy. 1994. 10(6):673–688.
Article
15. Johnson DH, Fanelli GC, Miller MD. PCL 2002: indications, double-bundle versus inlay technique and revision surgery. Arthroscopy. 2002. 18:9 Suppl 2. 40–52.
Article
16. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985. (198):43–49.
Article
17. L'Insalata JC, Harner CD. Treatment of acute and chronic posterior cruciate ligament deficiency: new approaches. Am J Knee Surg. 1996. 9(4):185–193.
18. Miller MD, Olszewski AD. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries: new treatment options. Am J Knee Surg. 1995. 8(4):145–154.
19. Sekiya JK, West RV, Ong BC, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Harner CD. Clinical outcomes after isolated arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005. 21(9):1042–1050.
Article
20. McAllister DR, Markolf KL, Oakes DA, Young CR, McWilliams J. A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2002. 30(3):312–317.
Article
21. Margheritini F, Mauro CS, Rihn JA, Stabile KJ, Woo SL, Harner CD. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces. Am J Sports Med. 2004. 32(3):587–593.
Article
22. Oakes DA, Markolf KL, McWilliams J, Young CR, McAllister DR. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: analysis of graft forces. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002. 84(6):938–944.
Article
23. Cross MJ, Powell JF. Long-term followup of posterior cruciate ligament rupture: a study of 116 cases. Am J Sports Med. 1984. 12(4):292–297.
Article
24. Hughston JC, Bowden JA, Andrews JR, Norwood LA. Acute tears of the posterior cruciate ligament: results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980. 62(3):438–450.
Article
25. Lipscomb AB Jr, Anderson AF, Norwig ED, Hovis WD, Brown DL. Isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term results. Am J Sports Med. 1993. 21(4):490–496.
Article
26. Schulte KR, Chu ET, Fu FH. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 1997. 16(1):145–156.
Article
27. Garofalo R, Jolles BM, Moretti B, Siegrist O. Double-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon-patellar bone-semitendinosus tendon autograft: clinical results with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2006. 22(12):1331–1338.
Article
28. Hatayama K, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Asagumo H, Takagishi K. A comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2006. 35(12):568–571.
29. Wang CJ, Weng LH, Hsu CC, Chan YS. Arthroscopic single-versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft. Injury. 2004. 35(12):1293–1299.
Article
30. Bergfeld JA, Graham SM, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE. A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using single- and double-bundle tibial inlay techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2005. 33(7):976–981.
Article
31. Whiddon DR, Zehms CT, Miller MD, Quinby JS, Montgomery SL, Sekiya JK. Double compared with single-bundle open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaver model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008. 90(9):1820–1829.
Article