Korean J Radiol.  2014 Dec;15(6):836-843. 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.836.

Moving-Shot versus Fixed Electrode Techniques for Radiofrequency Ablation: Comparison in an Ex-Vivo Bovine Liver Tissue Model

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 138-736, Korea. radbaek@naver.com
  • 2Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 443-380, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To compare the ablation characteristics of the moving-shot technique (MST) and the fixed electrode technique (FET) for radiofrequency (RF) ablation in an ex-vivo bovine liver tissue model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed RF ablation using FET in 110 bovine liver blocks using 11 different ablation times ranging from 5 seconds to 5 minutes (10 blocks per each time duration). Ten bovine liver blocks at each ablation time of 1- or 2-minute, were ablated with MST, which treated conceptual ablation units by moving the electrode tip. We evaluated the ablation volume obtained with FET across ablation time lengths. The results of FET and MST performed with the same ablation time lengths, i.e., 1- and 2-minute ablation time were also compared.
RESULTS
The ablation volume achieved with FET gradually increased with increasing ablation time; however, the pair-wise statistical comparison between 2 neighboring ablation time lengths was not significant after 30 seconds. MST with either 1- or 2-minute ablation time achieved larger ablation volumes (1.1 +/- 0.2 mL vs. 2.7 +/- 0.3 mL, p < 0.001; and 1.4 +/- 0.2 mL vs. 5.6 +/- 0.4 mL, p < 0.001, respectively), longer true RF times (46.7 +/- 4.6 seconds vs. 60 seconds, p < 0.001; and 64.8 +/- 4.6 seconds vs. 120 seconds, p < 0.001, respectively), fewer numbers of RF cut-offs (1.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 0, p < 0.001; and 5.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 0, p < 0.001, respectively), and greater energy deposition (2050.16 +/- 209.2 J vs. 2677.76 +/- 83.68 J, p < 0.001; and 2970.64 +/- 376.56 J vs. 5564.72 +/- 5439.2 J, p < 0.001, respectively), than FET.
CONCLUSION
The MST can achieve a larger ablation volume by preventing RF cut-off, compared with the FET in an ex-vivo bovine liver model.

Keyword

Radiofrequency ablation; Moving shot technique; Fixed electrode technique; Thyroid nodule; Intervention

MeSH Terms

Animals
Catheter Ablation/*standards
Cattle
Electrodes
Equipment Design
In Vitro Techniques
Liver/*surgery
Models, Biological
Temperature

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Measurement of ablation zone.A. On longitudinal plane, we measured vertical diameter (DV) along electrode. B. On transverse plane, we measured transverse diameter (DT1) perpendicular to DV in L-plane and another transverse diameter (DT2) in T-plane.

  • Fig. 2 Relationship between ablation volume and time using fixed electrode technique. Ablation volume gradually increased with increasing ablation time; however, pair-wise statistical comparison between 2 neighboring ablation time lengths was not significant after 30 seconds.

  • Fig. 3 Graphs of radiofrequency (RF) power, current, impedance, and temperature during 2-minute ablation using fixed electrode and moving-shot techniques.A. With fixed electrode technique, power graphed over time demonstrates that first RF cut-off appears at 33 seconds (arrow) and 6 RF cut-offs times (arrows) were detected during 2-minute ablation procedure. Drops of RF current and sudden increases of impedance were detected in corresponding area. These RF cut-offs denote cooling period that serves to prevent tissue carbonization near electrode tip. Total energy deposition was 0.68 kcal. B. With moving shot technique, RF power is maintained at approximately 50 watts during entire ablation procedure (arrows). Moving electrode tip could prevent RF cut-off, and total energy deposition was 1.32 kcal.


Cited by  1 articles

Ultrasound (US)-Guided Ablation of Thyroid Nodules
Byung Seup Kim
J Surg Ultrasound. 2023;10(1):14-23.    doi: 10.46268/jsu.2023.10.1.14.


Reference

1. Dupuy DE, Zagoria RJ, Akerley W, Mayo-Smith WW, Kavanagh PV, Safran H. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of malignancies in the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174:57–59. PMID: 10628454.
Article
2. Dupuy DE, Goldberg SN. Image-guided radiofrequency tumor ablation: challenges and opportunities--part II. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001; 12:1135–1148. PMID: 11585879.
Article
3. Gazelle GS, Goldberg SN, Solbiati L, Livraghi T. Tumor ablation with radio-frequency energy. Radiology. 2000; 217:633–646. PMID: 11110923.
Article
4. Kang TW, Rhim H, Kim EY, Kim YS, Choi D, Lee WJ, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for the hepatocellular carcinoma abutting the diaphragm: assessment of safety and therapeutic efficacy. Korean J Radiol. 2009; 10:34–42. PMID: 19182501.
Article
5. Goldberg SN. Radiofrequency tumor ablation: principles and techniques. Eur J Ultrasound. 2001; 13:129–147. PMID: 11369525.
Article
6. Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Mueller PR. Thermal ablation therapy for focal malignancy: a unified approach to underlying principles, techniques, and diagnostic imaging guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174:323–331. PMID: 10658699.
7. Rhim H, Goldberg SN, Dodd GD 3rd, Solbiati L, Lim HK, Tonolini M, et al. Essential techniques for successful radio-frequency thermal ablation of malignant hepatic tumors. Radiographics. 2001; 21 Spec No:S17–S35. PMID: 11598245.
Article
8. Baek JH, Kim YS, Lee D, Huh JY, Lee JH. Benign predominantly solid thyroid nodules: prospective study of efficacy of sonographically guided radiofrequency ablation versus control condition. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194:1137–1142. PMID: 20308523.
Article
9. Baek JH, Kim YS, Sung JY, Choi H, Lee JH. Locoregional control of metastatic well-differentiated thyroid cancer by ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197:W331–W336. PMID: 21785061.
Article
10. Baek JH, Moon WJ, Kim YS, Lee JH, Lee D. Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of autonomously functioning thyroid nodules. World J Surg. 2009; 33:1971–1977. PMID: 19575141.
Article
11. Jeong WK, Baek JH, Rhim H, Kim YS, Kwak MS, Jeong HJ, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules: safety and imaging follow-up in 236 patients. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18:1244–1250. PMID: 18286289.
Article
12. Lee JH, Kim YS, Lee D, Choi H, Yoo H, Baek JH. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of benign thyroid nodules in patients with incompletely resolved clinical problems after ethanol ablation (EA). World J Surg. 2010; 34:1488–1493. PMID: 20376445.
Article
13. Sung JY, Kim YS, Choi H, Lee JH, Baek JH. Optimum first-line treatment technique for benign cystic thyroid nodules: ethanol ablation or radiofrequency ablation? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196:W210–W214. PMID: 21257865.
Article
14. Baek JH, Lee JH, Valcavi R, Pacella CM, Rhim H, Na DG. Thermal ablation for benign thyroid nodules: radiofrequency and laser. Korean J Radiol. 2011; 12:525–540. PMID: 21927553.
Article
15. Ha EJ, Baek JH, Lee JH. The efficacy and complications of radiofrequency ablation of thyroid nodules. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2011; 18:310–314. PMID: 21841482.
Article
16. Baek JH, Jeong HJ, Kim YS, Kwak MS, Lee D. Radiofrequency ablation for an autonomously functioning thyroid nodule. Thyroid. 2008; 18:675–676. PMID: 18578625.
Article
17. Baek JH, Lee JH, Sung JY, Bae JI, Kim KT, Sim J, et al. Complications encountered in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules with US-guided radiofrequency ablation: a multicenter study. Radiology. 2012; 262:335–342. PMID: 21998044.
Article
18. Spiezia S, Garberoglio R, Milone F, Ramundo V, Caiazzo C, Assanti AP, et al. Thyroid nodules and related symptoms are stably controlled two years after radiofrequency thermal ablation. Thyroid. 2009; 19:219–225. PMID: 19265492.
Article
19. Ha EJ, Baek JH, Lee JH, Kim JK, Shong YK. Clinical significance of vagus nerve variation in radiofrequency ablation of thyroid nodules. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21:2151–2157. PMID: 21633824.
Article
20. Na DG, Lee JH, Jung SL, Kim JH, Sung JY, Shin JH, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules and recurrent thyroid cancers: consensus statement and recommendations. Korean J Radiol. 2012; 13:117–125. PMID: 22438678.
Article
21. Lee JD, Lee JM, Kim SW, Kim CS, Mun WS. MR imaging-histopathologic correlation of radiofrequency thermal ablation lesion in a rabbit liver model: observation during acute and chronic stages. Korean J Radiol. 2001; 2:151–158. PMID: 11752986.
Article
22. Morimoto M, Sugimori K, Shirato K, Kokawa A, Tomita N, Saito T, et al. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with radiofrequency ablation: radiologic-histologic correlation during follow-up periods. Hepatology. 2002; 35:1467–1475. PMID: 12029632.
Article
23. Clasen S, Schmidt D, Dietz K, Boss A, Kröber SM, Schraml C, et al. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation using internally cooled electrodes in ex vivo bovine liver: prediction of coagulation volume from applied energy. Invest Radiol. 2007; 42:29–36. PMID: 17213746.
24. Crocetti L, Lencioni R, Debeni S, See TC, Pina CD, Bartolozzi C. Targeting liver lesions for radiofrequency ablation: an experimental feasibility study using a CT-US fusion imaging system. Invest Radiol. 2008; 43:33–39. PMID: 18097275.
25. Lee JM, Han JK, Kim HC, Choi YH, Kim SH, Choi JY, et al. Switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation technique using multiple, internally cooled electrodes and a multichannel generator: ex vivo and in vivo pilot study. Invest Radiol. 2007; 42:163–171. PMID: 17287646.
26. Lee JM, Han JK, Kim HC, Kim SH, Kim KW, Joo SM, et al. Multiple-electrode radiofrequency ablation of in vivo porcine liver: comparative studies of consecutive monopolar, switching monopolar versus multipolar modes. Invest Radiol. 2007; 42:676–683. PMID: 17984764.
27. Lee JM, Han JK, Kim SH, Shin KS, Lee JY, Park HS, et al. Comparison of wet radiofrequency ablation with dry radiofrequency ablation and radiofrequency ablation using hypertonic saline preinjection: ex vivo bovine liver. Korean J Radiol. 2004; 5:258–265. PMID: 15637476.
Article
28. Na DG, Lee JH, Kim SM, Lim HK, Baek JH. Unidirectional ablation electrode to minimize thermal injury during radiofrequency ablation: an experimental study in an ex vivo bovine liver model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011; 22:935–940. PMID: 21530310.
Article
29. Haemmerich D, Laeseke PF. Thermal tumour ablation: devices, clinical applications and future directions. Int J Hyperthermia. 2005; 21:755–760. PMID: 16338858.
Article
30. Jang SW, Baek JH, Kim JK, Sung JY, Choi H, Lim HK, et al. How to manage the patients with unsatisfactory results after ethanol ablation for thyroid nodules: role of radiofrequency ablation. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81:905–910. PMID: 21388767.
Article
31. Huh JY, Baek JH, Choi H, Kim JK, Lee JH. Symptomatic benign thyroid nodules: efficacy of additional radiofrequency ablation treatment session--prospective randomized study. Radiology. 2012; 263:909–916. PMID: 22438360.
Article
32. Gharib H, Hegedüs L, Pacella CM, Baek JH, Papini E. Clinical review: nonsurgical, image-guided, minimally invasive therapy for thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 98:3949–3957. PMID: 23956350.
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr