Korean J Leg Med.  2013 Feb;37(1):1-8. 10.7580/kjlm.2013.37.1.1.

DNA Methylation-Based Age Estimation in the Forensic Field

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Forensic Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hylee192@yuhs.ac
  • 2Human Identification Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

The estimation of age is an important issue in forensic science, and the forensic community has attempted many times to establish methods for solving this issue. Aging leads to alterations in tissues and organs at the molecular level. These alterations at the molecular level may aid forensic scientists to estimate the age of a living person or a dead body. Initially, the focus was on the genetic components of aging, but recently, epigenetic mechanisms have emerged as the key contributors to the alterations in genome structure and function that accompany aging. In particular, DNA methylation is one of the best-understood mechanisms, and it has been suggested as a promising biomarker for age estimation in many studies. In this review, we summarize the recent studies on age-associated DNA methylation changes in different tissues and discuss its possible and practical applications in forensics.

Keyword

DNA methylation; Age estimation; Epigenetics; Forensics

MeSH Terms

Aging
DNA
DNA Methylation
Epigenomics
Forensic Sciences
Genome
Humans
DNA

Reference

1. Kayser M, de Knijff P. Improving human forensics through advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 12:179–92.
Article
2. Kayser M, Schneider PM. DNA-based prediction of human externally visible characteristics in forensics: motivations, scientific challenges, and ethical considerations. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2009; 3:154–61.
Article
3. Ohtani S. Estimation of age from dentin by using the racemization reaction of aspartic acid. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1995; 16:158–61.
Article
4. Sato Y, Kondo T, Ohshima T. Estimation of age of human cadavers by immunohistochemical assessment of ad-vanced glycation end products in the hippocampus. Histopathology. 2001; 38:217–20.
Article
5. Harley C, Futcher AB, Greider CW. Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature. 1990; 345:458–60.
Article
6. Tsuji A, Ishiko A, Takasaki T, et al. Estimating age of humans based on telomere shortening. Forensic Sci Int. 2002; 126:197–9.
Article
7. Meissner C, Ritz-Timme S. Molecular pathology and age estimation. Forensic Sci Int. 2010; 203:34–43.
Article
8. Zubakov D, Liu F, van Zelm MC, et al. Estimating human age from T-cell DNA rearrangements. Curr Biol. 2010; 20:970–1.
Article
9. Russo VEA, Martienssen RA, Riggas AD. Epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press;1996.
10. Gonzalo S. Epigenetic alterations in aging. J Appl Physiol. 2010; 109:586–97.
Article
11. Miranda TB, Jones PA. DNA methylation: the nuts and bolts of repression. J Cell Physiol. 2007; 213:384–90.
Article
12. Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002; 16:6–21.
Article
13. Wilson VL, Smith RA, Ma S, et al. Genomic 5-methyldeoxycytidine decreases with age. J Biol Chem. 1987; 262:9948–51.
Article
14. Vanyushin BF, Nemirovsky LE, Klimenko VV, et al. The 5-methylcytosine in DNA of rats. Tissue and age specificity and the changes induced by hydrocortisone and other agents. Gerontologia. 1973; 19:138–52.
15. Fuke C, Shimabukuro M, Petronis A, et al. Age related changes in 5-methylcytosine content in human peripheral leukocytes and placentas: an HPLC-based study. Ann Hum Genet. 2004; 68:196–204.
Article
16. Casillas MA Jr, Lopatina N, Andrews LG, et al. Transcriptional control of the DNA methyltransferases is altered in aging and neoplastically-transformed human fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003; 252:33–43.
17. Murgatroyd C, Wu Y, Bockmuhl Y, et al. The Janus face of DNA methylation in aging. Aging. 2010; 2:107–10.
Article
18. Rakyan VK, Down TA, Maslau S, et al. Human aging-associated DNA hypermethylation occurs preferentially at bivalent chromatin domains. Genome Res. 2010; 20:434–9.
Article
19. Bocklandt S, Lin W, Sehl ME, et al. Epigenetic predictor of age. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6:e14821.
Article
20. Koch CM, Suschek CV, Lin Q, et al. Specific Age-associated DNA methylation changes in human dermal fibroblasts. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6:e16679.
Article
21. Gronniger E, Weber B, Heil O, et al. Aging and chronic sun exposure cause distinct epigenetic changes in human skin. PLoS Genet. 2010; 6:e1000971.
Article
22. Bocker MT, Hellwig I, Breiling A, et al. Genomewide promoter DNA methylation dynamics of human hematopoietic progenitor cells during differentiation and aging. Blood. 2011; 117:e182–9.
Article
23. Teschendorff AE, Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, et al. Age-dependent DNA methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer. Genome Res. 2010; 20:440–6.
Article
24. Koch C, Wagner W. Epigenetic-aging-signature to determine age in different tissues. Aging. 2011; 3:1018–27.
Article
25. Bell JT, Tsai PC, Yang TP, et al. Epigenomewide scans identify differentially methylated regions for age and age-related phenotypes in a healthy ageing population. PLoS Genet. 2012; 8:e1002629.
Article
26. Simm A, Nass N, Bartling B, et al. Potential biomarkers of ageing. Biol Chem. 2008; 389:257–65.
Article
27. Dedeurwaerder S, Defrance M, Calonne E, et al. Evaluation of the infinium methylation 450K technology.
28. Garagnani P, Bacalini MG, Pirazzini C, et al. Methylation of ELOVL2 gene as a new epigenetic marker of age. Aging Cell. 2012; 11:1132–4.
29. Hannum G, Ginney J, Zhao L, et al. Genomewide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell. 2013; 49:359–67.
Article
30. Zou H, Hastie T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Statist Soc B. 2005; 67:301–20.
Article
31. Heyn H, Li N, Ferreira HJ, et al. Distinct DNA methy-lomes of newborns and centenarians. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109:10522–7.
32. Bibikova M, Le J, Barnes B, et al. Genomewide DNA methylation profiling using Infinium assay. Epigenomics. 2009; 1:177–200.
33. Shames DS, Minna JD, Gazdar AF. Methods for detecting DNA methylation in tumors: from bench to bedside. Cancer Lett. 2007; 251:187–98.
Article
34. Frommer M, McDonald LE, Millar DS, et al. A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89:1827–31.
Article
35. Zhang Y, Rohde C, Tierling S, et al. DNA methylation analysis by bisulfite conversion, cloning, and sequencing of individual clones. Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 507:177–87.
Article
36. van den Boom D, Ehrich M. Mass spectrometric analysis of cytosine methylation by base-specific cleavage and primer extension methods. Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 507:207–27.
Article
37. Dejeux E, El abdalaoui H, Gut IG, et al. Identification and quantification of differentially methylated loci by the pyrosequencing technology. Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 507:189–205.
Article
38. Licchesi JD, Herman JG. Methylation-specific PCR. Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 507:305–23.
Article
39. Brena RM, Plass C. Bio-COBRA: absolute quantification of DNA methylation in electrofluidics chips. Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 507:257–69.
Article
40. Kaminsky Z, Petronis A. Methylation SNaPshot: a method for the quantification of site-specific DNA methylation levels. Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 507:241–55.
Article
41. Oakes CC, La Salle S, Trasler JM, et al. Restriction digestion and real-time PCR (qAMP). Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 507:271–80.
Article
42. Frumkin D, Wasserstrom A, Budowle B, et al. DNA methylation-based forensic tissue identification. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011; 5:517–24.
Article
43. Lee HY, Park MJ, Choi A, et al. Potential forensic application of DNA methylation profiling to body fluid identification. Int J Legal Med. 2012; 126:55–62.
Article
44. Kayser M, Liu F, Janssens AC, et al. Three genomewide association studies and a linkage analysis identify HERC2 as a human iris color gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82:411–23.
Article
45. Liu F, Wollstein A, Hysi PG, et al. Digital quantification of human eye color highlights genetic association of three new loci. PLoS Genet. 2010; 6:e1000934.
Article
46. Branicki W, Brudnik U, Kupiec T, et al. Determination of phenotype associated SNPs in the MC1R gene. J Forensic Sci. 2007; 52:349–54.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJLM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr